There were, in meeting the crisis of the 1930s, two positions.
(a) Let the Government spend the minimum necessary to keep men alive and to prevent social disturbance; or
(b) Let the Government spend on such a large scale as to provide a positive powerful stimulus to recovery.This second alternative is often formally embraced by those who in practice support the first position. That is, the actual scale of expenditures that they propose, while sufficient to bring about a serious derangement of the budget, is not sufficient to exert an adequate stimulus to recovery. In consequence, depression conditions tend to be frozen over a considerable period.
Harry Dexter White, 2/26/35

5 comments
November 12, 2011 at 12:15 pm
silbey
Incoming Krugman link!
November 12, 2011 at 12:31 pm
eric
Evidently the Internet is a more genteel place than the last time we got an incoming Krugman link.
November 12, 2011 at 1:25 pm
Chris Johnson
I, for one, am disappointed that Krugman’s link to your post has been up for over four hours and you haven’t yet had a drive-by visit from one of the members of the Amity Shlaes Flying Squad.
November 12, 2011 at 1:27 pm
ari
All things come to those who wait, Chris.
November 13, 2011 at 3:34 am
Thomas
Professor! Just saw the Krugman link. Expect some words of congratulations from an anonymous undergrad this Tuesday.