This advice on business writing, although pitched against academic writing, actually seems like pretty sound advice for academics, except maybe for the advice to use “I” and “you”. But: don’t assume a captive audience, get to the point, cut, especially cut fancy words, and it’s okay to begin sentences with conjunctions—all of that sounds pretty good.
Recent comments
- 160serpentinegmailcom on An open letter from the populists of the 1890s to the populists of today
- 160serpentinegmailcom on Trumpism, local and global
- eric on A wreck by any other name: on the inadequacy of “Great Recession”
- Brad DeLong on A wreck by any other name: on the inadequacy of “Great Recession”
- Alex on Hitchens minor on the English and their history
- David in San Jose on Trump, populism, Hofstadter, Heer.
- eric on What does Paul Campos know that the Public Policy Institute of California does not?
- ari on What does Paul Campos know that the Public Policy Institute of California does not?
- eric on Keeping a finger on gold
- ari on Keeping a finger on gold
- kevin on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- ari on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on A life well lived!
This is officially an award-winning blog
Archives
- July 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- January 2013
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- May 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
6 comments
November 1, 2011 at 10:46 am
ben
especially cut fancy words
B-but!
November 1, 2011 at 11:36 am
eric
Well, ben, they’re talking about writing prose, not poetry like what you produce.
November 1, 2011 at 4:17 pm
Western Dave
I agree with pretty much everything but the part about reading aloud. One of the biggest hang-ups that kids have is recognizing the difference between written speech and spoken speech. Reading aloud does not help with this.
Otherwise I teach 4 principals that I call ACRE. Argument, Clarity, Repetition, Evidence. (or if you prefer ACER). Your argument comes first, clarity is important, repetition helps the reader remember what you are arguing, and you need to provide the evidence to support your ideas (unless your David Brooks and just make it up.)
A couple of useful catch phrases. For kids that are wordy and using language that is beyond them: “It is better to be smart than to sound smart.” On Clarity: “Your writing should be a walk in the park on a clearly marked path. Your reader shouldn’t feel like they are hacking through a jungle.” Or, “Be kind to your readers and do the work for them.” On repetition: “Think of a line of Shakespeare you can remember. [You almost always get To be or not to be, … Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou, Romeo, or A horse, a horse my kingdom for a horse.] You remember it because of repetition. Repeat key words and phrases. And if your still stuck on worrying about varying your word choices, it’s better to get an A- for repeating yourself than a C+ because you unintentionally changed your ideas by varying your language and using words that you didn’t really know how to use.
November 1, 2011 at 5:19 pm
Vance Maverick
I agree that the introduction should swiftly engage the reader in the work of the text. But that’s not to say the introduction should literally state the text’s main point! That might be appropriate for emails or memos, short-lived and meant to spur specific action — but even academic papers are broader than that.
November 2, 2011 at 11:11 am
Mark
@ Western Dave: On the other hand, I find reading aloud to be an excellent way to copy-edit, as well as a handy means of identifying and untangling my more Baroque sentences.
November 5, 2011 at 10:59 am
Jonathan Jarrett
And I recommend it to my students for those exact same reasons. After all, quite a lot of academic work is destined to be read out! I’m not saying that’s an ideal way to present, but one of the reasons historians and literature scholars can get away with it more than others is that they are used to writing stuff for reading out.