As a followup to this post, I randomly encountered a Google Ad from the Appomattox Court House tourist board:
Too perfect.
Advertisements
Recent comments
- 160serpentinegmailcom on An open letter from the populists of the 1890s to the populists of today
- 160serpentinegmailcom on Trumpism, local and global
- eric on A wreck by any other name: on the inadequacy of “Great Recession”
- Brad DeLong on A wreck by any other name: on the inadequacy of “Great Recession”
- Alex on Hitchens minor on the English and their history
- David in San Jose on Trump, populism, Hofstadter, Heer.
- eric on What does Paul Campos know that the Public Policy Institute of California does not?
- ari on What does Paul Campos know that the Public Policy Institute of California does not?
- eric on Keeping a finger on gold
- ari on Keeping a finger on gold
- kevin on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- ari on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on A life well lived!
This is officially an award-winning blog
Archives
- April 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- January 2013
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- May 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
12 comments
April 10, 2010 at 7:21 am
Margarita
Well, if you squint a little and cock your head to the right, and ligature the first two letters of script, it could be read as “Ahistoric” Appomattox. Kind of.
Oh, who cares? It feels so good!
April 10, 2010 at 7:37 am
kid bitzer
oh, i dont think that’s such a distortion of events. yes, it does lend a specious air of volition to what was wholly involuntary on one side. but is also in keeping with much of lincoln’s own rhetoric. just think how angry he was to have gettysburg described as the successful repulsion of a foreign invader from our national soil.
not that i’m anywhere near as generous as he was. i liked a suggestion at tnc’s site, of bumper-stickers saying “what part of appomattox do you not understand?”
April 10, 2010 at 8:05 am
Margarita
Lincoln’s rhetoric was that there was nothing to “reunite.” The Union was indissoluble. That was my take on the offending slogan anyway.
April 10, 2010 at 12:14 pm
silbey
oh, i dont think that’s such a distortion of events.
It’s NOT when the war ended, was my point. It’s NOT when “our nation” reunited, in too many ways to count.
April 10, 2010 at 3:23 pm
grackle
Doing a quick glance across the page, I misread “Historic” as Christ at; and what a nice combo of myths that would be.
April 10, 2010 at 3:48 pm
eric
I misread “Historic” as Christ at
This reminds me of my favorite Oxford joke; it helps if you know that Lincoln and Jesus colleges are right across the street from each other.
American family walks into the porter’s lodge at Jesus College and looks around.
Porter asks, “Can I help you?”
American dad says, “We’re looking for Lincoln. Is this Lincoln?”
Porter says, “No sir, this is Jesus.”
American dad looks in the guidebook, looks at the quad, says, “It looks like Lincoln.”
Porter says, “Well, you Americans always did have trouble telling them apart.”
April 10, 2010 at 3:51 pm
kid bitzer
silbey– yeah, fair enough.
April 10, 2010 at 10:13 pm
andrew
Maybe further research will determine that, while there was a five year rise in the level of violence at the beginning of the 1860s, a civil war never happened.
April 11, 2010 at 5:34 am
Erik Lund
Andrew: that depends. Is the Civil War a dubious narrative that allows us to stop thinking about subjects that make us uncomfortable? Maybe if you were to call it “the War of Northern Aggression.” Because I’m pretty sure _that_ never happened.
April 11, 2010 at 9:27 am
aimai
Well, it was “A” civil war, whoever you think started it. “The Civil War” is actually a fairly good descriptor. But after years of Southern whining I’m thinking of having a bumpersticker made up that says “More Wars of Northern Aggression, Please.”
aimai
April 11, 2010 at 9:35 am
THE CON
I thought you all would like this. CNN’s main article this morning “Were Confederate Soldiers Terrorists?”
http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/04/11/martin.confederate.extremist/index.html?hpt=C1
April 11, 2010 at 11:33 am
TF Smith
I was in look-away land last week with the spouse, and as we went walking, we came across a lovely little city park – restored 19th Century homes, pond, ducks, statue of Dixecrat governor, etc.
Then we saw a large (8 foot +) statue of what could only be described as a seriously ticked-off angel: wings, sword (artfully situated to cover the nether regions), etc.
We were both curious, so we walked over to check the base – Daughters of the Confderarcy, whatever-chapter, to honor the Confederate dead, circa 1908.
The entertaining side note was that it was cast at the Union Bronze Company, Brooklyn, NY…
And then later the same week I found myself a few miles away from Stone Mountain, GA – where, according to the people I was working with, mostly AA, there is (today) a large population of AA, both native-born and 1st generation.
All of which is to say that the South makes Edgeland’s various human/ethnic/tribal weirdnesses look tame…
And yes, more than a few were – Quantrill comes to mind.