So said the New York Times about the big news on this day in 1934: that Adolph Hitler had consolidated his control over Germany.
Recent comments
- 160serpentinegmailcom on An open letter from the populists of the 1890s to the populists of today
- 160serpentinegmailcom on Trumpism, local and global
- eric on A wreck by any other name: on the inadequacy of “Great Recession”
- Brad DeLong on A wreck by any other name: on the inadequacy of “Great Recession”
- Alex on Hitchens minor on the English and their history
- David in San Jose on Trump, populism, Hofstadter, Heer.
- eric on What does Paul Campos know that the Public Policy Institute of California does not?
- ari on What does Paul Campos know that the Public Policy Institute of California does not?
- eric on Keeping a finger on gold
- ari on Keeping a finger on gold
- kevin on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- ari on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on A life well lived!
This is officially an award-winning blog
Archives
- July 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- January 2013
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- May 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
12 comments
August 19, 2009 at 11:12 am
Jonathan Dresner
Reading the article, I’m not sure that they’re talking in that quote about Hitler, or about the possibility that he might be facing some opposition or reservations on the part of his “otherwise unmolested” voting citizenry.
A member of our synagogue brought in some old local newspapers — library disposal — and I noticed an article about the American Jewish response in 1934.
August 19, 2009 at 11:37 am
bitchphd
Ooooooops.
August 19, 2009 at 11:39 am
Ben Alpers
That article from the Times is also interesting because it claims that former Marxists are Hitler’s most loyal supporters. Somebody inform Jonah Goldberg!
August 19, 2009 at 12:35 pm
icr
Of course they were right-there was no reason to either hide under the bed or launch preemptive war in 1934.
In a sane world there would be a draft for saber rattlers only (regardless of age ) that would require them to spend at least several months clearing mine fields.
August 19, 2009 at 12:45 pm
icr
“Eighty-nine and nine-tenths per cent of the German voters endorsed in yesterday’s plebiscite Chancellor Hitler’s assumption of greater power than has ever been possessed by any other ruler in modern times”-NYT
The NYT, however, was busy studiously ignoring the power of the guy in charge of the USSR and his recent forced collectivization program that had exterminated seven million or more Ukrainians, Kazakhs and others. Of course we should have declared war on Stalinist Russia at the earliest opportunity. :)
August 19, 2009 at 12:46 pm
bitchphd
Somebody inform Jonah Goldberg!
Oh god, please don’t.
August 19, 2009 at 12:47 pm
kid bitzer
this nyt article was clearly written by…neville chamberlain! with an umbrella!
August 19, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Vance
icr, I don’t think anyone’s saying that at that juncture, war was justified. But I think it’s uncontroversial to say that Hitler’s rise to dictatorship was of international concern. (Jonathan, that’s how I interpret the organization of the article — the “international concern” line is a lead-in to the next titled section.)
August 19, 2009 at 2:09 pm
politicalfootball
You’re right, icr. It’s an outrage how hypocritical the NYT was. With our sophisticated modern understanding of journalistic objectivity, you wouldn’t see the media bashing Hitler this way. It’s not fair and balanced.
August 19, 2009 at 2:19 pm
serofriend
former Marxists are Hitler’s most loyal supporters
Place the former in theoretical context, and that’s not too surprising, is it?
August 19, 2009 at 2:26 pm
Ahistoricality
Of course they were right-there was no reason to either hide under the bed or launch preemptive war in 1934.
Yeah, he’d only established concentration camps for Communists, and barred Jews from public employment. Nothing radical, and nothing a Buchananite would consider problematic.
August 19, 2009 at 7:36 pm
Uncle Billy the Un-Cunctator
Tensions with China, N. Korea, Iran (what no Libya?), and Russia. An acquaintance returns from a trip across the country and declares that they’re safely back in “antebellum L.A.”
The United States perceived as weak…
Sales of firearms and ammunition through the roof…
Financiers and arms dealers are always happy to encourage killing…
Internal tensions starting to grumble very loudly…