South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford has been tipped as one of the rising stars of the GOP, with potential presidential hopes in 2012. That makes the events of the last week all the more strange. Sanford disappeared. No one knew where he was: not his wife, not his office, not the Governor’s security detail. He was gone. The stories put out got stranger and stranger. First, his office said, he had gone off to work on some writing projects by himself. Then, he was walking the Appalachian Trail to clear his mind after the recent legislative session. The office did mention that his last call to them had been traced to a cellphone tower near Atlanta, which led immediately to the question of why his office had been tracking him via cell phone towers.
Nonetheless, everyone insisted, things were just fine. Sanford would come back on Wednesday to resume the business of government in South Carolina, which had essentially been in abeyance in his absence, as he had not handed over power to the Lt. Governor before leaving.
Then, things got even weirder. Sanford was not on the Appalachian Trail, or in Atlanta. He was in Argentina:
South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford was in Argentina during a dayslong unexplained absence, not hiking the Appalachian Trail as his staff told the public when state leaders raised questions about his whereabouts, the governor told a newspaper
What he was doing there remains unclear. The governor claimed he was simply driving along the coast line in Argentina. The Appalachian Trail, his original destination, proved unattractive:
The Republican governor told the South Carolina newspaper he decided at the last minute to go to the South American country. The governor says he had considered hiking on the Appalachian Trail but wanted to do something “exotic.”
So he flew to Argentina to drive the coast. The problem, as the Associated Press pointed out, is that driving the coast in Argentina is not all that easy:
Trying to make such a drive could frustrate a weekend visitor to Argentina. In Buenos Aires, the Avenida Costanera is the only coastal road, and it’s less than two miles long. Reaching coastal resorts to the south requires a drive of nearly four hours on an inland highway with views of endless cattle ranches. To the north is a river delta of islands reached only by boat.
The Governor did not reveal if he had seen either Waldo, or Carmen Sandiego.
Buenos Aires |
![]() |
He was down there, somewhere |
47 comments
June 24, 2009 at 8:10 am
Alice Michtom
Why would anyone want to be a politician? Why would anyone *believe* in a politician?
June 24, 2009 at 8:16 am
kathy a.
kind of wacky, huh? apparently his wife didn’t even know where he was, and he missed father’s day with their 4 kids. also, he took off on this jaunt in a SLED [state law enforcement division, the state police] vehicle, after ditching his security detail.
so, what we have here is a dedicated and responsible head of state, fully engaged with his governmental responsibilities, always putting the needs of the people above his own, demonstrating family values, and scrupulously declining to abuse his power and misuse state assets.
June 24, 2009 at 8:21 am
ari
As long as he didn’t eat any ice cream during his trip, I still trust Governor Sanford more than that Hussein
OsamaObama fella.June 24, 2009 at 8:38 am
politicalfootball
You know, I really wanted to take a contrarian view on this and say that if the press doesn’t know where the governor is for a week, screw ’em. Cops are still on the beat, roads are still being built, federal government money is still being rejected – all the essential functions of Sanford’s government can continue while the governor takes a trip to blow off some steam.
But in the end, I have to agree with Digby:
June 24, 2009 at 8:40 am
politicalfootball
Ack. I linked the wrong thing. Here’s Digby:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/06/ooookay-by-digby-gov.html
June 24, 2009 at 8:42 am
ari
I think governors should be able to do pretty much what they want — within the law, of course — but Sanford didn’t turn the keys to the state government over to the lt gov, right? And that’s a pretty big no-no.
June 24, 2009 at 9:16 am
North
Ari’s right. The weird part isn’t that he wanted to take off on his own to chill for a little while. But you tell someone where you are, even if you’re going to turn your phone off. And you make some kind of contingency plan in case there’s a major disaster whie you’re gone. If you can’t imagine that something crazy might happen during your vacation, you don’t have enough imagination to be governor.
June 24, 2009 at 9:27 am
Kieran
I await the truth with interest. The arc of political scandal is long, but it bends towards attractive young staffers.
June 24, 2009 at 9:33 am
ari
The arc of political scandal is long, but it bends towards attractive young staffers.
Perfect.
June 24, 2009 at 9:41 am
politicalfootball
You gotta love Josh Marshall’s coverage of this. He’s got a great eye for scandal, and his crowd-sourcing is as good as anybody’s.
June 24, 2009 at 10:24 am
max
And lord, he is a weirdo:
(That’s from the fawning AmConMag profile of Feb.)
max
[‘Those wacky libertarians.’]
June 24, 2009 at 10:35 am
Seth
I await the truth with interest. The arc of political scandal is long, but it bends towards attractive young staffers.
Well spoken, although I’m thinking he was either drunk or gay. Or both.
June 24, 2009 at 10:37 am
Erik Lund
So, apart from running off to spend the week with his Facebook hookup, what, specificially, was Governor Sanford supposed to do with/to the Lt. Gov? I sense a manufactured scandal here (well, apart from the hookup). It’s like all the Whigs manufacturing James VII/II’s abdication out of some foolin’ about with the Great Seal.
Wait… this is a Whig blog, isn’t it? OMG.
June 24, 2009 at 10:41 am
dana
I’m with Kieran. Cherchez la femme. Or l’homme (the man is a Republican, after all), as the case may be.
But joking aside, even that explanation fails to… explain how this makes any sense at all.
June 24, 2009 at 11:09 am
PorJ
What’s bizarre here is that people are actually believing the crap spewed by him and his wife.
Think about it for a minute: she knew. His people knew. They are lying for a reason… following me? Good.
There used to be a decent amount of conspiracy-loving people on these comment threads. Why have we all become a bunch of gullible-“what-an-odd dude” believers? Why shave with occam’s razor and assume its the other woman (or man?)?
As we used to say back in Bensonhurst: cui bono?
I dare say we need Kathy O. on the trail here. Did this dude go to some Bilderbung meeting? Is he possibly – like Dick Cheney – a shape-shifter? Is he the pre-ordained successor to Obama, and did “they” start preparing him for his new role? I, for one, feel quite certain THE MAN is behind this.
My theory: look no further than the Amero.
June 24, 2009 at 11:18 am
Bitchphd
I *hope* it’s a sex scandal, because the other option is that the man is having a bit of a mental breakdown.
June 24, 2009 at 11:19 am
Bitchphd
I admire his anti-ac stance, though.
June 24, 2009 at 11:26 am
max
I admire his anti-ac stance, though.
If he lived in California, near the coast, it would make sense. (Seriously, read the profile. The man is big on unneccessary suffering.)
because the other option is that the man is having a bit of a mental breakdown.
I’m pretty sure it’s head; it’s not in the profile but he suffers from depression (or so I read somewhere).
max
[‘And given his family, and his, uh, ‘values’, I’d be fucking depressed.’]
June 24, 2009 at 11:34 am
TF Smith
Don’t cry for him…
June 24, 2009 at 11:35 am
Bitchphd
Nope. According to ABC, Kieran, uh, nailed it.
June 24, 2009 at 11:37 am
silbey
Sex scandal
So should the new catch phrase be “Walking the Appalachian Trail” or “Driving the Argentine Coast”?
June 24, 2009 at 11:42 am
Bitchphd
Walking the Appalachian train down to Buenos Aires.
(kieran’s idea, not mine)
June 24, 2009 at 11:44 am
DaKooch
I find the idea of using “backpacking the Appalachian Trail” as an excuse while gallivanting down to Argentina for a little tryst too funny to the nth degree. What was he originally trying to do, appeal to the South Carolina granola-head vote? Is there a South Carolina granola-head vote? The whole episode kinda gives a new meaning to the concept of “expanding your base”.
June 24, 2009 at 11:46 am
max
Nope. According to ABC, Kieran, uh, nailed it.
And let this be a lesson to you, young lady: government stimulus leads to inflation and BAM! you’re in an Argentinian.
max
[‘Don’t come for me, Evita.’]
June 24, 2009 at 11:53 am
Dave Snyder
We live, literally, two blocks from Sanford’s Governor’s Mansion. We have a spare bedroom. Locust-descending paparrazi welcome. $200/night, meals not included.
June 24, 2009 at 11:57 am
silbey
So who tipped the reporter to be there when Sanford’s plane flight arrived?
June 24, 2009 at 11:59 am
TF Smith
Wilbur Mills, meet Mark Sanford…
June 24, 2009 at 12:20 pm
PorJ
I still think he’s using this affair to cover something more….
sinister.
June 24, 2009 at 12:28 pm
JPool
I think “Walking the old Appalachian Trail” has more euphemistic possibilities: “I think the junior senator might have been taking a stroll down the old Appalachian Trail this weekend.”
“Walking the Appalachian Trail down to Argentina” can be for formal occasions.
June 24, 2009 at 2:15 pm
kathy a.
no a/c in the governor’s mansion, isn’t that special? notice, there is nothing about no a/c in the governor’s office. columbia s.c. in the summer is one of the rungs of hell [no offense meant to the commenter with a room for rent, or other residents]. no wonder the family fled to sullivan’s island; and i hope they keep that place in the soon-to-be-announced divorce proceedings.
June 24, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Ahistoricality
He went to Argentina for a long weekend. How long does it take you to break up with someone?
June 24, 2009 at 2:36 pm
max
columbia s.c. in the summer is one of the rungs of hell [no offense meant to the commenter with a room for rent, or other residents]. no wonder the family fled to sullivan’s island; and i hope they keep that place in the soon-to-be-announced divorce proceedings.
Ah. He was taking after Daddy, and teaching the value of suffering.
How long does it take you to break up with someone?
It’s like he’d never heard of a phone.
max
[‘Or twitter!’]
June 24, 2009 at 3:37 pm
andrew
Did someone mention air-conditioning?:
June 24, 2009 at 3:38 pm
andrew
I think I have a comment about air-conditioning caught in the spam filter, awaiting rescue.
June 24, 2009 at 3:39 pm
Vance
Approved.
June 24, 2009 at 3:40 pm
andrew
Thanks.
June 24, 2009 at 3:44 pm
kathy a.
the value of making your family suffer? it may be traditional, but damn.
June 24, 2009 at 3:56 pm
max
the value of making your family suffer? it may be traditional, but damn.
Well, it seems to be traditional to him. See the link I posted way up there. He also has a thing (I’d forgotten) about digging holes. With tractors. And then he has (or had) to fill them up again due to accumulation of water resulting in mesquito swarms.
max
[‘Perhaps he is… sexually frustrated.’]
June 24, 2009 at 4:00 pm
Vance
Yeah, Ahist, I picture him breaking up with her at the last possible moment, like on the way back to the airport.
For lovers of unintentional ambiguity like me and SB, there’s his wife’s statement:
God send none of us ever have to endure such love….
June 24, 2009 at 4:32 pm
kathy a.
seriously, she thinks he just “earned” his way back? by being such a complete doofus that he not only betrayed his family, but put his state into a 5 day tizzy, and made headlines in every newspaper for his bizarre behavior?
well, at least she didn’t have to stand there with him at the press conference. but i still predict a divorce filing within a week.
June 24, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Walt
I’d take him back. He’s dreamy. Plus, he writes a mean love email.
June 24, 2009 at 7:59 pm
jazzbumpa
Well, I’m just grateful he’s deflected the media attention from Toledo mayor, Carty Finkbeiner, who is standing tall on the ticket issue.
Other than that, I have to say they guy has pretty much lost it.
June 24, 2009 at 9:00 pm
kathy a.
well, with any luck he can get right back to digging holes at the family farm in his air conditioned machinery. you know, turning the earth, smelling the diesel, bopping to the music, scaring the wildlife, not having to answer to anyone. you know, the way a man should live.
it sounds like the mayor of toledo could use a trip down to the farm, too. south carolina is well and truly embarassed, but at least their village idiot didn’t try to enforce a ban on gravel driveways: then he’d really be in trouble.
June 24, 2009 at 9:23 pm
kathy a.
holy cow, max. i had to read way down, but perhaps this guy ought not to be in charge of excavators.
June 25, 2009 at 10:21 am
TF Smith
He’s Out-law Mark….Out-law Mark…can you hear me?
June 25, 2009 at 10:50 am
Charlieford
With everything that’s occurred in the past 10 or so years–from Clinton and Gingrich and Packwood and Livingstone and Hyde to Foley and Craig and Spitzer and Ensign (I’m sure I’ve left a few dozen out)–how utterly out of touch with how the world works does one have to be not to think that a stunt such as this is going to get exposed? I mean, I realize the guy’s completely whacked ideologically, but at last, does the man have no instinct for self-preservation?
June 25, 2009 at 11:02 am
Matthew Ernest
An elected official who lied to his electorate about having an affair and misused government resources as part of the cover-up… *and* voted to impeach Bill Clinton.
You can’t make this stuff up.