[Author’s note: I talked to the graduate students today about the AHA interview process, so I thought I’d re-post the suggestions I put up here last year. You’d think that having aged a year, and having acquired infinitely more wisdom, I’d have something new to add. But no, not much has changed, I’m afraid.]
It’s the most wonderful time of year. No, not Christmas silly, the AHA. Or, as I’m fond of calling it, the world’s largest and least flattering mirror. The mere thought of thousands of historians gathered in one place warms the cockles of my heart. Particularly cockle-warming, of course, are AHA interviews, the preliminary candidate screening done by most history departments at the annual conference.
For the past few years, I’ve offered our graduate students a talk in which I’ve shared a few tips about how to handle the AHA interviews they receive. And, given the nature of this blog, I thought I’d pass along some of these ideas here. If you’re not a historian, I don’t know how useful this material will be, though I expect some of what I say is exportable to the AAG, the MLA, or most other three-letter waking nightmares. That said, much of what follows is targeted at graduate students in history. Also, although this should go without saying, I can’t promise that any of this will work for you. So let me know what you think. Or, if you’ve got an idea that’s missing from my list, by all means post a comment.
Preparation
1: Bear in mind that for all of your interactions with Prospective Employer (PE) your tone should be respectful but not cowed, enthusiastic but not crazed, and humble but not obsequious. Your goal is to convey several things with this tone. First, that you’re genuinely excited about the job at PE’s institution. Even if this isn’t entirely true, you’ll have plenty of time to relay that hard fact after you’ve received an offer. For the moment, though, remember that you’re eager to get the job. Second, that you’re not scared by professional obligations, including the job market. Third, that you’re exactly the kind of person PE will want to have working down the hall from her or him for the next three decades. And finally, that you’re prepared. Eric wrote a wonderful post about this issue last week. Read what he said and takes him seriously. Even when he’s kidding.
2: Given all of that, the best piece of advice that I got when I was having my fifteen minutes of infamy following Katrina was this: don’t ever answer the phone unless you know exactly what you want to say. Hiding until you’re ready to talk isn’t an option when dealing with PE. But I do recommend, if you receive a phone call inviting you to interview at the AHA, allowing PE to say her or his piece, conveying your gratitude, and then making plans to talk again in the coming days after you’ve had time to think. In other words, let PE tell you what s/he has to say, and then reply with something like: “I’m excited about this opportunity. And I’m really looking forward to meeting with you in person. Is there a time in the next few days that we can talk, or correspond via e-mail, about questions that I might have?” Again, this will allow you to collect your thoughts, do research, and figure out which questions you do and don’t want to ask.
3: Before talking or e-mailing again, do your preliminary research. Learn a bit about PE’s department. Given that most of us apply to every job that makes even the tiniest bit of sense for us, including any job that we’d even consider taking (and likely several that we wouldn’t), we often know very little about the institutions to which we’ve applied. There’s no shame in that; there is shame, though, in not knowing about places that will interview you at the AHA. Shame typically followed by unemployment. So figure out, based on what you can learn from friends, friends of friends, or the internet, anything you can about the department: the curriculum; whether there are graduate students; what the undergraduates are like; the teaching load; where the position fits in their program; other holes in their department; whether, within reason, it’s a happy place; what their priorities are (teaching, research, a wintry mix); where the school is located; etc. The etcetera refers to anything at all you can learn using reasonable methods. No, reasonable does not include picking through the department chair’s trash.
4: After you’ve done that work, talk again with PE. You should be prepared to ask a variety of questions, including seeking clarification for what you might already know. For example, in which hotel will the interview take place? Will the interview be conducted in a suite? If so, does PE already know the suite number? And if PE doesn’t know that information, how will s/he let you know before your interview? If the interview won’t take place in a suite, where will it be? In the open-air stock pavilion that’s usually found somewhere in the bowels of the main conference hotel? That’s okay. (Not really, but what can you do?) But you’ll want to hear that news as soon as possible. Also, what day and time will the interview happen? Would PE like your cell phone number in case there are any last-minute changes? Is there a way of contacting PE at the conference should the need arise? And finally, who, other than you, will be present for the interview?
Just to reiterate, your tone should always be respectful, enthusiastic, and humble. So, here’s an an example of an appropriate way to ask the final question of those listed above: “I hope I’m not overstepping, but would you be willing to let me know who else will be interviewing me. That information would really help me prepare more effectively.” The worst PE can say is: “Sorry, we’re not yet sure.” Or: “Sorry, but I haven’t told the other candidates. And telling you who’ll be there might give you an unfair advantage.” But chances are PE will tell you. Which will allow you to:
5: Figure out as much as you can about the composition of the interview committee. No, this does not mean reading everything they’ve ever written. But you might want to know the arguments of their major works. And, at the very least, you should know what they’ve written about. As Eric said, scholars like to be flattered. At the same time, the AHA interview, in a perfect world, turns into a conversation between peers. That’s much more likely to happen if you know what PE and company have to say about the past.
6: Almost every AHA interview follows the same basic form. “Tell us about your research,” says a member of the hiring committee. Then other people on the committee follow up with specific questions about your work. After a set amount of time, another member of the committee asks some iteration of: “What about your teaching?” So be ready to answer those questions. Know what your work is about, focusing on the so-what question. You should have good, and relatively short, answers ready that explain what you’re writing about, the significance of your dissertation, your main argument, where it fits in the literature, when you plan to finish, and what you’ll be writing about next. Understand that even the most professional hiring committees will typically have at best one person, usually the chair, who knows your work. It’s your responsibility, then, to tell the rest of the committee why your scholarship is important. You want them to remember you and your project when they go to the bar that evening to talk over how the day’s interviews went. And you want them to remember the key points when they return to their department and report on the status of the search to their colleagues after the winter break.
7: You should also have a polished response explaining what you’d like to teach (recognizing that their needs not your desires should inform your answer), how you teach (methods and the difference between your introductory, intermediate, and advanced undergraduate courses, as well as, if relevant, your graduate courses), and what courses you’ve taught in the past. You should prepare an answer in which you detail how both your research and your teaching will complement what PE’s department already has on the books.
8: Practice your answers. Which is to say, find a friend, have them ask you a series of questions that are likely to come up at the AHA interview, and make sure that you have replies that are both true and plausible. And finally, please, please remember not to give answers that drone on for too long. How long is too long? More than a couple of minutes, I think, but this varies from person to person. So experiment.
9: Decide what you’re going to wear. Then pack carefully, making sure that you have all the materials you’ll want or need. About attire I have little to say beyond: be comfortable and appear professional. For me, that means wearing a suit. But that’s because suits are easy for me; they’re grown-up Garanimals. Maybe you want to wear pants and a sport coat. Or a dress. Or a kilt. Fine. Whatever. Just make sure that you feel good about what you’re wearing and that your clothes aren’t going to distract the committee from your brilliance. So maybe skip the kilt.
Performance:
1: You’ve made it through the hardest, though not the scariest, part. Now all you have to do is to figure out a way to do your best on the day of the interview. You’ll want to start by continuing to prepare, as tragic as that may sound, once you reach the conference. Make sure that you know where the interview is located. The AHA is usually spread out over many hotels that sometimes occupy several linear miles of the host city. Find the hotel and exactly where your interview is taking place. Recently, in Atlanta, there was more than one hotel owned by the same company. Several job candidates, apparently, missed interviews because they went to the wrong place. Eeek! Don’t allow such a thing to happen to you. And while we’re in full-on control freak mode, find out if the floor on which you’ll be interviewing is accessible by elevator. If you’re interviewing in the communal interrogation chamber, take a look at it in advance. Familiarize yourself with the smell of fear that permeates the place. Also, figure out how long it will take you to walk or cab or bus or teleport from where you’ll be before the interview to the interview hotel. In sum, cover all of your bases, so that on the day of the interview you don’t have to worry about any of this nonsense and can focus on substance. Speaking of which…
2: On the big day, make sure that you maximize the chances that you’ll feel good. Need a big breakfast in order to have energy? Then eat. Coffee makes you irritable? Don’t drink it. Exercise is a must for you to feel human? Go running. Need your meds in order to keep from howling at the moon? Me too. Make sure you take ‘em. In sum, take care of yourself.
3: Make sure that you’re a bit early to the hotel where you’ll be interviewed. Then, relax in the lobby until it’s time to head upstairs. (Or, perish the thought, downstairs if you’re to be grilled at the cattle call.) Might you run into another candidate for the job while you’re waiting? And if so, will the interaction be strained? Sure and sure. But be nice anyway. Bear in mind that s/he may be on a prize committee reviewing your book some day.
4: When you arrive at the interview itself, shake hands. Make eye contact with every member of the interview committee. Convey to them before you do anything else that you’re very pleased to meet them, very excited about the chance to talk about your work, and really thrilled about the opportunity the job represents. If they aren’t polite enough to tell you where to sit – not impossible in the anti-social world of the academy – ask where they’d like you to locate yourself. Then sit down. Open the bottle of water that you’ve brought for yourself. Did I fail to mention that you should bring your own water? Sorry. You should. Take out the pad of paper on which you’ll make notes, as needed, throughout the interview. I forgot to mention the pad also? Can’t you think of anything on your own? So, now it’s time to sit back, subtly take a deep breath or two, and try as hard as you possibly can to relax. The questions will begin shortly.
5: You should have practiced quite a bit for this next part. So the answers should come readily enough to you. That said, remember that you don’t want your responses to sound canned. And should PE pose a question that stumps you, there are several options at your disposal. You can ask PE to repeat a question. And if you’re still uncertain about what PE is after, or you don’t know what to say in response, you can paraphrase the question and ask if that’s what PE means. This will buy you time. Or, you can say, “Hmm, that’s an excellent question. Would you mind if I think about that for a minute?” Or, if you really have no idea what to say, admit that you have no answer. Never, under any circumstances, pretend that you know something that you actually don’t. I was once asked which five ecologists I would use as case studies in a class on the history of that discipline. I could only think of three, tried to bluff my way through the rest, and made a complete fool of myself. Don’t put yourself in a similar position.
6: Here are some strategies that, if possible, you might want to employ during the interview. Make connections between answers. “That’s a wonderful question Professor X, and it reminds me of something that Professor Y asked earlier.” It’s also nice if your answers demonstrate that you know something about the hiring committee’s work or the curriculum at their institution. “Given that you have three people teaching courses about the post-war period, it seems likely that you’d want me to teach a class on the Progressive Era. Which I’ve done before.” “I know that you, Professor Z, have written about Truman’s dentures. And I’d love to talk to you some time about the next project I’m planning, which focuses on the history of dentistry.” Or whatever.
7: Remember to convey, with body language and eye contact, to all of the members of the committee that you respect them. I’ve seen candidates crash and burn because they never looked at one member of a committee or they turned their back on another.
8: When it’s time for you to ask questions, make sure that your inquiries are innocuous but demonstrate that you’ve done your homework. “I’ve noticed that you have senior thesis requirement. Will you tell me a bit about that?” “I’m curious to hear more about the methods class that you offer your graduate students.” That sort of thing. You don’t want to ask any questions that will put PE or other members of the committee on the defensive: about sabbatical policies (there might not be any), teaching load (it might be high), pay (it could be low), and many others. Again, you want to leave them with the impression that you’ll be a good colleague – not a high-maintenance jerk – and that you really want the job. If it turns out that you don’t, the best time to decide that is after it has been offered to you. Keep in mind that hiring committees, no matter how good their home institution, are terrified that their favorite candidate is going to take a job at Harvard. Or Yale. So while you shouldn’t lie about your level of interest, you should make sure that you stress the positives. “Oh, XU is located in a pestilential swamp. Well, I had yellow fever as a child and really love alligator meat.” You don’t want to take this too far. But it’s a killer if they leave saying: “She’ll never take the job. There’s no point in bringing her to campus.” One more thing: it’s appropriate for you to ask about the committee’s timetable, when, in other words, they’re likely to be in touch about their decision.
Post-game:
1: Don’t beat yourself up about your mistakes. There will be mistakes. You’ll feel lousy about forgetting the title of Richard Hofstadter’s second book. Oh well. Move on. But don’t forget your errors. Consider how to do better next time. Make notes.
2: Share information with friends or acquaintances. This sounds counter-intuitive, I’m sure, but it’s the right thing to do. Even if you’re competing with classmates for the job of your dreams, behave like a good person. You’ll feel better about yourself. And what goes around comes around. Again, remember that your competition today may be your colleague tomorrow, the person sitting next to you on a hiring committee at a national conference.
3: Send a brief and heartfelt note of thanks to all of the committee members.
Good luck.
40 comments
December 2, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Ahistoricality
Excellent stuff, all around. I’d make one quick addition:
Then pack carefully
If you are traveling to the conference (or later, to the interview) by air, make sure you have at least one interview outfit in a carry-on bag instead of in checked luggage.
I had a nervous first day at the AHA once, until the airline found my stuff. Fortunately, my only Thursday meeting was an informal one, and, if the stuff hadn’t arrived by dinner, there was at least one major department store in walking distance….
Also, I’d emphasize the post-game admonition to “make notes”: Unless you have a very small number of interviews, they will start to run together in your head pretty quickly. The more notes you have, the easier the next stage will be.
December 2, 2008 at 8:46 pm
ari
That’s an excellent point about bringing an outfit in a carry-on.
December 2, 2008 at 8:46 pm
Marichiweu
Good advice. I’d just add to stay well-hydrated in advance of the interviews, and pay particular attention to hygiene. Fear plus dehydration plus last night’s booze makes up that potent aroma that clogs the job placement center – can’t do anything about the fear, and probably won’t do much about the booze, but at least keep watering yourself in advance.
Maybe you can’t say that to your grad students. But many of them stink.
December 2, 2008 at 8:47 pm
ari
Our graduate students are impeccably attired and quite clean, thank you very much.
December 2, 2008 at 9:44 pm
Nathan Williams
I like my AHA conference better.
December 2, 2008 at 11:58 pm
Josh
Keep writing this sort of stuff, ari. The more you do, the better I feel about not having gone to grad school.
December 3, 2008 at 3:31 am
Michael Turner
A bit of last-minute mental preparation that has served me well in job interviewing: go in thinking, “If they offer me a job, it will be one of at least two offers I’ll choose between.”
Believe it or not, getting people believing that you’re the type of person who is used to having choices can make you more appealing to the kind of people you want to work for. Of course, there are those who want to hire the desperate because the desperate are easier to exploit and discard. But who wants to work for them anyway?
Another one: listen for the slip “when you’re working here/with us/at our place” as opposed to “if”. First, it makes you listen more carefully, and leaves a good impression. But more important: 9 times out of 10, if you hear “when” even once, it means they want you (they might not even be fully aware of it, but they made up their minds over 50% just in the first 1
December 3, 2008 at 3:33 am
Michael Turner
[he continues] first 10 seconds or so.) Finally, you leave the interview with some degree of certainty about how they feel about you. So you stress out less in anticipation of the uncertainty you know you’re going to feel.
December 3, 2008 at 5:01 am
kid bitzer
ari, this is excellent. and i’m impressed at how directly it carries over to the mla experience.
can i offer a further thought on performance?
all of your advice, it seems to me, could be summed up by saying:
for the course of the interview, act as though you are in a classroom, and your interviewers are your students.
that may seem counter-intuitive, since they are the tenured, established grandees, and you’re only a young pup. but consider:
there’s a good chance that you know more about your topic than anyone there. there’s a good chance, as you noted, that at most one of them has actually read your work, or done more than skim the abstract. so you really are in a position to *teach* them.
and your tasks in the interview are teaching tasks: to convey new information crisply and attractively, allowing your level of detail to be demand-driven. i.e., give them enough to make it possible for them to ask good questions, and then let them ask. don’t drone on, but make it clear that you can always go deeper if deeper is desired.
most importantly, the interview is like a classroom because the ways you can fuck it up are like the ways you can fuck up teaching. being rude to professor x? the main reason that’s bad is because it suggests you’re going to be *rude to your students*. not making eye contact with professor y? good teachers constantly make eye contact with their students.
and the ways you can succeed in an interview are by doing good teaching. making connections between answers, as per your 6? that’s exactly what good teachers do. and bluffing? pretending you know stuff you don’t know? good teachers don’t do that. even with a freshman class, you don’t make shit up. students will ask you stuff you don’t know, too, and how you answer in class gives them a big (unintentional) lesson in whether you truly respect scholarship or not.
so my summary advice would be: approach your interview as though you were going to teach a small, upper-division seminar to a classroom of unusually bright students. very few have done the reading. one has a bad attitude. another is hung over. still, you need to connect with them, get them interested in your project, show why they should care about what you care about, and leave them with two, possibly three new thoughts.
in other words: teach them.
believe me, that’s how your performance is going to be judged. the most common crash-and-burn assessment after the candidate has left the room is “i just can’t see how we could put him in front of a group of students”. she just lectured at us; we couldn’t get a word in. he hunkered down behind his briefcase and never peered out; there was a ghostly whisper but no other presence. he is clearly pleased with how smart he is and how much he knows; in fact, he’s kind of an asshole.
you may not have had teaching practice like this; maybe you’ve only ta’ed for giant lectures. fair enough; this will be the seminar you have always wanted to teach. approach it that way.
and on all the other scores, ari, great great post.
December 3, 2008 at 5:05 am
albiondia
It took me a while to figure out that, for logistical reasons, interviews for jobs at history depts. in American universities might be conducted at national conferences. My confusion was exacerbated by the reference to the hotel suite, which at the time struck me as a little seedy.
December 3, 2008 at 5:33 am
kid bitzer
“which at the time struck me as a little seedy.”
you ain’t seen nothin. the hotel suite interviews look swank in comparison to the hotel single-room interviews, and those in turn are palatial in comparison to the meet-us-in-the-lounge interviews.
it’s seediness unbounded on the lower end.
December 3, 2008 at 6:16 am
kid bitzer
hey ari–
“Eric wrote a wonderful post about this issue last week.”
this was a live link when you posted this last year. but now it’s not a live link. (and he didn’t write the wonderful post last week–not *that* one, though doubtless others).
so–freshen it up, eh?
December 3, 2008 at 6:42 am
Jorge G
Where *is* this legendary post by Eric?
You were very bad and did not provide a link. :P
December 3, 2008 at 6:47 am
Neddy Merrill
One point that is often made to candidates: the relationship between how you think you did and the outcome (callback or not) is pretty much nonexistent. Keep in mind the million variables at work here, and stay stoic.
December 3, 2008 at 7:28 am
kid bitzer
the ideal candidate is also resourceful and web- savvy, jorge.
ari has a link at the top of this page to the original posting; that has a good link to eric’s post.
and on self-assessments of candidate performance, i gotta go with neddy over michael turner. nobody knows how they did.
more than that; on the vast majority of cases, not only do committees not “make up their minds in the first ten seconds”, there is not even agreement ten hours or ten days later. you’re being hired by a committee; it’s going to deliberate, vacillate, get excited over you at one meeting, lose it’s ardour at the next, and wind up offering the job to a compromise candidate that no one really loved.
as you walk out the door, you cannot know what they think, because there is not yet any fact of the matter.
don’t worry; you did great. doesn’t somebody around here, dana maybe, like to quote that old line from seneca about what’s up to us and what’s not? it’s good advice on the market.
December 3, 2008 at 7:29 am
dana
I am fond of a jug, bitches.
December 3, 2008 at 7:29 am
dana
(translation mine.)
December 3, 2008 at 7:31 am
kid bitzer
zat you, seneca? not exactly the quote i remember.
December 3, 2008 at 8:36 am
Larry Cebula
Do you really think “most” departments interview at the AHA? I know it can seem that way when you are there, but I don’t think that is true.
December 3, 2008 at 9:29 am
Neddy Merrill
Right, you can’t know how you did because
(a) members of the committee will probably perceive you differently;
(b) you’re being compared with a group of other people, and you don’t know what they did or who they are;
(c) more than you’d expect, the criteria being used to evaluate you are complex and in flux (e.g., how the committee weights various area concerns will move around a bit);
(d) to a terrifying degree, the outcome will be affected by who’s cranky or irritable or especially persuasive when the department holds its meeting.
You’ll never know if they liked you a lot but not as much as three other people, liked you but thought they should go with someone with different interests, thought you were lousy…
December 3, 2008 at 9:31 am
Neddy Merrill
Epictetus.
December 3, 2008 at 9:50 am
kid bitzer
epicfailus.
did i say something about not pretending to know shit you don’t know? yeah, well, i made that shit up, too.
December 3, 2008 at 10:04 am
ari
Thanks for the comments, everyone. I’ve added the live link to Eric’s post. And kb, I think you’re right about teaching. In fact, that point came up yesterday during my talk. Still, I hesitate to frame it precisely that way, as different people have different teaching styles. Finally, Larry, you’re right. More and more places, perhaps especially this year, don’t interview at the AHA. I’m not sure if that’s a good or a bad thing. Probably both.
December 3, 2008 at 10:28 am
MichaelElliott
Great post, Ari. For any English folk out there, I think all of this carries over to the MLA. (English folk, though, should be especially prepared to talk about teaching *writing*.) A key thing to any brief interview: figure out before hand what are the 2-3 things that I want PE to know about me, and try to get the conversation there.
Anecdotally, I often hear from students that they are surprised how much of the interview is about teaching. I think that’s often true at schools even with some research component. Be ready to talk about teaching in very concrete ways. One trick I recommend is to make up some mock syllabi and, instead of handing them out, be ready to talk about them. (When you talk about how you’d teach a course, don’t just go through a list of readings: talk about the goals of the course and how you would structure it.)
By the way, again for any English listeners out there, I’ve written some of my own take on this down, and you can download it on my dept’s placement page: http://english.emory.edu/graduate/placement/placement.htm
Look for the “Unofficial Guide to the Job Search in English.” It’s free, and you know how much free advice is worth.
December 3, 2008 at 10:29 am
eric
as different people have different teaching styles
Right. Your technique of berating your students till they break down weeping probably wouldn’t work out in an interview.
December 3, 2008 at 10:31 am
eric
Also, I have a twinge of guilt now, since I never wrote the “job talk” post I promised at the end of that post last year.
December 3, 2008 at 10:34 am
Jimmy
I’m in a different field but your advice here is much appreciated. If only we had such attentive and reasonable advisors in my department.
December 3, 2008 at 10:41 am
ari
Actually, Jimmy, instead of attending to my students, I write blog posts.
December 3, 2008 at 10:46 am
ari
Actually actually, instead of writing blog posts, I recycle old ones.
December 3, 2008 at 10:52 am
Robyn
Jimmy:
I don’t know how reasonable this is in your particular department, but Ari’s talk is part of a student organized series of talks by the professors, all loosely categorized as professional development. Might you be able to approach a professor or two about giving something similar? It generally just involves the asking, the finding of a space, and sending out an email and thus is a quite easy task with pretty large rewards for a number of people. Granted, it may be easier for me as I have a quasi-official status in the department (it’s my job to arrange these things), but so far I’ve had very good luck indeed with having professors come and give excellent talks, on subjects they’ve spoken about before (like Ari’s) and on new ones (like Eric’s gracious talk on statistics last week). You may find that professors who have less time for you individually might be willing to give a short talk to a number of students.
December 3, 2008 at 11:22 am
Matt L.
Ari, thanks so much for the post. Its very kind of you and your department to approach this issue systematically. I got no practical advice from faculty when I went to AHA. The only thing I really learned about the process was from other grad students plus trial and error for three years. My program did nothing I mean *zilch, zip, zero, nada* to prep its grad students for AHA interviews.
A few students asked their advisers to set up mock interviews, but that was rare. There was a chump (cough, I mean, the most junior member of the faculty) who was supposed to be the ‘placement officer’ but it was pretty loosey goosey (i.e. junior faculty have the least amount of time to do anything…).
December 3, 2008 at 11:35 am
ben
Infinite wisdom plus infinite wisdom is still just infinite wisdom, ari. Be content.
December 3, 2008 at 1:41 pm
Want to nail that AHA interview? « parezco y digo
[…] Posted by parezcoydigo under Uncategorized | Tags: AHA | Some good advice at edgeofthewest. […]
December 3, 2008 at 2:09 pm
Lori
Just a few additional comments based on interviews conducted by colleagues: (1) if you have a cold, take medication so you do not sneeza and cough all over the committee, (2) zip your fly, (3) know the answer to “what classes would you like to create?”, and (4) don’t answer your cell phone during the interview.
December 3, 2008 at 6:38 pm
andrew
Infinite job seekers need infinite wisdom to succeed in the infinity of interviews held in the infinity of suites at the Hotel Infinity.
Number of jobs: finite.
December 4, 2008 at 5:39 pm
T. R. Brereton
Having done this myself — long, long ago — and endured the god-awful humiliation of the AHA interview process (even worse, some of the the dreaded “meat-market” interviews), my advice is simply, “don’t go.”
If a department is genuinely serious about seeing a prospect, then it should have the professional courtesy to follow the customary protocol. Those that don’t, you wouldn’t want to work for.
December 4, 2008 at 7:05 pm
ben
Is there really a customary protocol for history that doesn’t start with an AHA interview? Lucky ducks, I guess.
December 29, 2008 at 9:05 pm
annmerry
Thanks for the article – I found it very very useful – and that’s saying a lot given the fact that I’ve spent the past few days pouring over other advice/articles in the Chronicle of Higher Ed, and reading all about interviewing in the book “The Academice Job Search Handbook” (very helpful also).
December 29, 2008 at 9:16 pm
ari
You’re welcome, ann. And good luck if you’ll be at the AHA.
December 30, 2008 at 8:08 pm
AHA-ing « history-ing
[…] to the conference: at Tenured Radical, The AHA for Dummies, and at Edge of the American West, AHA interviews, redux. I’m also looking forward to fellow history bloggers’ paper sessions, including Sterling […]