One of these days I’m going to write a comprehensive post about Hoover revisionism. Until then, you might like this short squib, which I wrote before it emerged that the bailout bill gives Paulson the discretion to do just what I describe the New Deal RFC doing in the article. (According to this registration-walled Roubini post, it got into the bill partly by some fuzzy language, secured by Barney Frank’s ostentatious comments about the legislators’ intent during the debate.) So this considerably heightens the pressure on this non-New Deal administration to act like New Dealers.
Recent comments
- 160serpentinegmailcom on An open letter from the populists of the 1890s to the populists of today
- 160serpentinegmailcom on Trumpism, local and global
- eric on A wreck by any other name: on the inadequacy of “Great Recession”
- Brad DeLong on A wreck by any other name: on the inadequacy of “Great Recession”
- Alex on Hitchens minor on the English and their history
- David in San Jose on Trump, populism, Hofstadter, Heer.
- eric on What does Paul Campos know that the Public Policy Institute of California does not?
- ari on What does Paul Campos know that the Public Policy Institute of California does not?
- eric on Keeping a finger on gold
- ari on Keeping a finger on gold
- kevin on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- ari on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on “Eight schools account for half of all history professors.”
- eric on A life well lived!
This is officially an award-winning blog
Archives
- September 2021
- July 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- January 2013
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- May 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
7 comments
October 9, 2008 at 10:43 am
politicalfootball
It also heightens the pressure on the U.S. to not screw up and elect another non-New Deal administration.
October 9, 2008 at 10:43 am
eric
One could certainly draw that conclusion.
October 9, 2008 at 11:08 am
politicalfootball
To be fair, Stan Lee was only about 10 years old at the time, and decades away from discovering the great moral lesson imparted through Spider-Man comics. Maybe Hoover just didn’t know he was supposed to be responsible.
Bush, though, has no excuse.
October 9, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Jason B
Bush, though, has no excuse.
I think he does, actually. The lesson works with Spider-Man because Peter Parker was bitten by a radioactive spider, which granted him super powers. Dubya, on the other hand, was bitten by a radioactive Ronald Reagan (a much lower life-form than an arachnid) and was granted super-self-deception powers and the ability to hypnotize conservatives.
October 9, 2008 at 3:36 pm
jfwells
Don’t let the registration scare you away from Roubini’s site. They are offering a free membership during these troubling economic times, and the insight and analysis there is top-shelf.
October 10, 2008 at 3:03 am
drip
jfwells is right about Roubini, which got me to thinking. Once Roosevelt came into office he seemed to be able to find intellectual talent at will. William O. Douglas, Thurmond Arnold, Stuart Chase, Harry Hopkins, Harold Ickes, etc. where did they come from? Will Obama find this type of brainpower or will he have to rely on the technicians at the big financial institutions (not that they aren’t smart).
October 10, 2008 at 8:10 am
eric
drip, given the wealth of talent that has been sidelined over the past eight years owing to the administration’s relative lack of interest in plain old expertise, I have an idea there might be no trouble in that department.