The National Research Council’s 2010 rankings of research-doctorate programs arrived today. (There is, or was, a webcast.) It is the first version of the rankings compiled since 1995 and relies on data collected in 2005-2006.
PhDs.org already has the new data on their site, so you can punch up rankings—or rather, ranges of rankings; they won’t, or can’t, provide a singular rank—based on your own criteria. Here, for the sake of fun and games, is the ranking of history departments based on an overall quality measure.
Advertisement


3 comments
September 28, 2010 at 1:18 pm
transportinburma
Did anyone ever explain why these took so long to finish? Was everyone just too busy with their real work?
September 28, 2010 at 4:22 pm
Michael Elliott
Here’s another way to compare-and-contrast:
http://chronicle.com/page/NRC-Rankings/321/
September 28, 2010 at 6:13 pm
profbigk
Brian Leiter’s blog [Leiter Reports] has an absorbing analysis, providing criticism and some representation of criteria used in the NRC rankings.
http://leiterreports.typepad.com/