I had more or less made my peace with the outcry over the Cordoba Initiative‘s community space + masjid near Ground Zero until the weekend’s Palin silliness.
As if you didn’t know, Palin tweeted as follows:
Ground Zero Mosque supporters: doesn’t it stab you in the heart, as it does ours throughout the heartland? Peaceful Muslims, pls refudiate…Peaceful New Yorkers, pls refute the Ground Zero mosque plan if you believe catastrophic pain caused @ Twin Towers site is too raw, too real….Peace-seeking Muslims pls understand. Ground Zero mosque is UNNECESSARY provocation; it stabs hearts. Pls reject it in interest of healing
There’s something obscene about Palin reminding “peaceful” New Yorkers that the pain of 9/11 is “too raw.” But what really set me off is the idea that “peaceful Muslims” should oppose the masjid because of its associations with 9/11. Here’s the tension: we’re always hearing calls for “moderate muslims” to repudiate extremism, denounce terrorism, etc., but the guy heading the Cordoba Institute is pretty much the paradigm case of the moderate muslim who rejects al Qaeda, Sharia-for-all, global caliphate, all that. The Cordoba Initiative is all about being the moderate Muslim voice. One problem, therefore, is that he’s being opposed by the people ostensibly calling for…more of what he wants to do.
The second problem: the CI masjid will be “unnecessary provocation” only if people see the pain of 9/11 as caused by muslims rather than, say, extremist muslims in al Qaeda. (If I were more enthused about this post I’d make up a story about “how dare you build a synagogue near where that Jewish guy did that terrible thing” etc. etc.) Complaining about the symbolism or psychological effects just helps to cement the idea that the relevant reference class is muslim rather than something else. The point of amplifying the “moderate voice” is to show what is true, viz., the muslim community is a diverse one with a very small minority who likes to blow stuff up. The collective responsibility view implicit in Palin’s opposition is diametrically opposed to that. And you wonder why Step ibn-Fetchit doesn’t come running when you call. (NB slight edit for increased zing.)


17 comments
July 20, 2010 at 10:32 am
chris
If I were more enthused about this post I’d make up a story about “how dare you build a synagogue near where that Jewish guy did that terrible thing” etc. etc.
McVeigh was Christian, right? Are there churches in Oklahoma City? How dare they?
July 20, 2010 at 10:39 am
Vance
I’m given to understand that some Muslims have taken to using the subway and sidewalks near the WTC too. Have they no respect for the feelings of the citizens of Alaska?
(Slightly more seriously: do you prefer lower-case “muslim”, Neddy?)
July 20, 2010 at 10:47 am
Thorn
There is indeed a giant statue of Jesus weeping just across the street from the OKC memorial and a largish church on its other flank. My response to this hullabaloo was similar to Chris’s.
July 20, 2010 at 1:11 pm
Malaclypse
Good thing Native Americans don’t take this approach, or we will need to rip up pretty much every church in the whole country.
July 20, 2010 at 1:56 pm
JP Stormcrow
The OKC mentions give me another opportunity to link to one of my favorite GWOT items: the Oklahoma Global War on Terrorism License Plate. Because the catastrophic pain caused @ Twin Towers site is too raw, too real for the good folk of the heartland in a way coastal elitists could never understand.
July 20, 2010 at 1:58 pm
JP Stormcrow
And just now noticed for the first time that the plate has a pixellated military camouflage background.
July 20, 2010 at 2:06 pm
Davis X. Machina
They should have used PANDER instead of SAMPLE on the plate…
July 20, 2010 at 3:22 pm
Ben Alpers
BTW, that Oklahoma License Plate was apparently passed and signed into law in 2006, when both houses of our State Legislature as well as the Governor’s office were controlled by Democrats. It passed the Democratic-controlled House by a vote of 98-0.
(If this comment were a post, I’d give it the tag “Why I’m A Registered Independent”)
July 20, 2010 at 4:39 pm
Vance
“This war on terrorism is only a sample war. If it had been an actual war, you would have been given a plausible account of its goals and the plan to meet them.”
July 20, 2010 at 4:54 pm
jacob
To be fair to Oklahoma, Virginia has a 9/11 themed license plate too. Just as much of a crime against graphic design, though.
July 20, 2010 at 5:24 pm
Alvis
Yes, but something actually happened in VA on 9/11.
July 20, 2010 at 8:49 pm
Vance
My fair state has a memorial license too, but so nearly abstract as to seem almost….tasteful.
July 21, 2010 at 1:07 am
saintneko
Can’t we just say it was caused by some crazy dudes squatting in caves on the other side of the world, rather than associating the actions of a couple hundred people with, what, a quarter of the world?
There are 50% more muslims than there are folk in our hemisphere. They are friends and peers to many, because really, how often do you ask someone if they are muslim. Mostly, we just presume because they have skin with a different color than ours. Most may live on the other side of the planet.
But only .000000066% of the muslim population had direct involvement with the Trade Center attacks, assuming about 100 people actively worked on it. Bump that to 1000 people working on it and you still only have .00000066%….
So that’s a pretty big fuck-you to a large portion of your fellow humans.
July 22, 2010 at 12:07 pm
DOW
Probably too late in the comments, but I’m wondering: Is there a reason you don’t capitalize “muslim?” Is there some new usage and understanding of the term I ought to adopt?
July 22, 2010 at 12:09 pm
DOW
Sorry, belatedly I see the question has already been asked. But not answered.
July 22, 2010 at 12:09 pm
NM
No I was just lazy.
July 22, 2010 at 6:58 pm
DOW
Noted.