Now, there’s a whole intellectual industry, mainly operating out of right-wing think tanks, devoted to propagating the idea that F.D.R. actually made the Depression worse. So it’s important to know that most of what you hear along those lines is based on deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. The New Deal brought real relief to most Americans.
That said, F.D.R. did not, in fact, manage to engineer a full economic recovery during his first two terms. This failure is often cited as evidence against Keynesian economics, which says that increased public spending can get a stalled economy moving. But the definitive study of fiscal policy in the ’30s, by the M.I.T. economist E. Cary Brown, reached a very different conclusion: fiscal stimulus was unsuccessful “not because it does not work, but because it was not tried.”
I think we need a new post category.


18 comments
November 10, 2008 at 8:12 am
Richard
Tabarrok’s got a new post up, where he states the obvious and assumes his statement changes everything.
He quickly deleted my comment where I called him out for misrepresenting you in his first post. What a coward.
November 10, 2008 at 8:34 am
Jay C
I think we need a new post category.
“New Deal Revisionist Nonsense” ?
November 10, 2008 at 9:34 am
Sam-I-am
I think we need a new post category.
“A Nobel Laureate’s Got my Back” ?
November 10, 2008 at 9:36 am
Ahistoricality
I think we need a new post category.
“Zombie-slayer”?
November 10, 2008 at 10:40 am
expat lumberjack
“I am Right and You are Wrong, Neener Neener Neener”
November 10, 2008 at 1:12 pm
bitchphd
“Megan McArdle has no shame”
November 10, 2008 at 2:55 pm
Ben Alpers
Shorter Eric: “Really? I’ve got Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman right here.”
Shorter Krugman: “You know nothing of the New Deal…How you ever got to teach a course in anything is utterly amazing!”
November 10, 2008 at 5:06 pm
urbino
But the definitive study of fiscal policy in the ’30s, by the M.I.T. economist E. Cary Brown, reached a very different conclusion
Well, in defense of the revisionists, why should anybody listen to a guy whose name starts with an initial? I mean, that’s wicked elite. And un-American.
November 10, 2008 at 8:17 pm
rja
I think we need a new post category.:
“I know you’re not dissing FDR”
November 10, 2008 at 8:18 pm
urbino
“Oh no you di-uhn’t!”
November 10, 2008 at 8:25 pm
dana
“punks jump up to get beat down”
November 10, 2008 at 8:47 pm
urbino
Winner.
November 11, 2008 at 7:31 am
Chris
One of Krugman’s commenters points out that this movement’s disregard for inconvenient facts resembles a certain other form of historical revisionism… Accordingly, I propose the term “New Deal denier” (and related forms).
November 11, 2008 at 7:40 am
Rich Puchalsky
“New Deal denialist” is better. “Denier” implies a single person; “denialist” implies a whole propaganda campaign / nutbar subculture.
Of course, if global warming denialists are any guide, they are going to complain about the connotations of the word. Well, there really isn’t any better one. They would have preferred “sceptics”, but a sceptic evaluates facts. “Revisionist” also gives them a bit too much intellectual credit.
November 12, 2008 at 12:50 am
Michael Turner
An admittedly immodest proposal: “NDCTRC”
It’s virtually Google-unique, too, at the moment. wgreen’s “teh daat” is a larger (or perhaps overlapping) category, as I pointed out.
November 14, 2008 at 1:37 pm
Relevant History « PowerUp
[...] Eric Rauchway, with the invaluable tactical air-support of Paul Krugman, has been engaged in some excellent debunkery of anti-FDR historical revisionism. What I’ve always found interesting about the right-wing [...]
November 25, 2008 at 6:43 am
gappy
Is it possible to have a pointer to an article or work by Cary Brown? I should just note that Fiscal Policy studies are always very complicated and controversial, and repeatedly quoting a single scholar (as channel by Krugman) is slightly suspect. This is not my field, but I would appreciate a few concrete references and maybe a few references to opposing views, just to make the point that the Rauchway is not-one handed.
November 25, 2008 at 7:01 am
eric
In fairness, I quoted Brown before Krugman started “channeling” him, gappy. The article in question is this one:
E. Cary Brown, “Fiscal Policy in the ‘Thirties: A Reappraisal,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 46, No. 5 (Dec., 1956), pp. 857-879.