On this day in 1969, according to the New York Times,
A White House messenger interrupted a Georgetown University French class … and called into the hall a baldish 19-year-old student wearing a jacket and tie.
The young man so unfortunately described by the Times reporter was Randall James Dicks, better known as Randy, who had written a letter to Richard Nixon criticizing the president’s statement that “under no circumstances” would he be affected by the scheduled anti-Vietnam War protest coming up shortly. The White House staff, thinking it would be good for the president to respond to one protesting undergraduate, picked Dicks.
Dicks wrote Nixon, “It has been my impression that it is not unwise for the President of the United States to make note of the will of the people.” What would Nixon say to Dicks? According to Rick Perlstein, Nixon kept rejecting drafts to Dicks, insisting that the final reply sound “more manly.”1
Dicks, the Times reported, liked to write heads of state and had been doing it since he was eight; judging by the report, it appears they wrote back more often than one might think. Dicks also enjoyed philately and classical music. “He just bypassed the rock ‘n’ roll stage,” his mother said. Mothers can be unkind.
The kicker in the Nixon/Dicks saga came when reporters asked about the politics of this young man, the representative undergraduate whom the White House had chosen for its photo op response to the protest. “I believe that a monarchy is a superior form of government because a king is above partisan politics and can therefore be responsive to the people.”2 Vetting was hard work back then too.
1Rick Perlstein, Nixonland, p. 428.
2“Student critic of Nixon: Randall James Dicks,” NYT 10/14/1969, p. 22.


12 comments
October 3, 2008 at 2:10 am
andrew
Dicks, the Times reported, liked to write heads of state and had been doing it since he was eight
My favorite letter from a kid to a head of state is Castro’s letter to FDR.
October 3, 2008 at 4:39 am
tom
Wow, that letter from Castro is priceless.
October 3, 2008 at 6:05 am
Vance
So what happened when the messenger called him into the hall? Did he just deliver this letter?
October 3, 2008 at 7:51 am
Josh Carrollhach
Dicks and Bush have the same idea of statesmanship, it seems.
October 3, 2008 at 9:18 am
TF Smith
Granted, it was 1969, but a 19-year-old college student wearing a jacket and tie…an undercover Young Republican?
October 3, 2008 at 9:19 am
Sir Charles
Isn’t Randy Dicks a porn star? Well he ought to be.
October 3, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Student
Given Georgetown’s official status as a Jesuit institution, with a Foreign Service school as well, I can see how back in the 1960s (or maybe even today, I don’t know) it might have been a haven for kids who wanted to come to class with a neck tie and jacket.
October 3, 2008 at 2:38 pm
Fats Durston
9-year-old college student wearing a jacket and tie…an undercover Young Republican?
I think I just saw a film (the mind might’ve wandered a bit) where the student body at my institution was required to wear jacket and tie until chicks showed up. ~1970. (And the first set of chicks was nuns.)
October 3, 2008 at 8:11 pm
Tyrone Slothrop
Am I the only one who wonders whatever became of Dicks?
October 3, 2008 at 11:04 pm
urbino
Radical feminism rendered them superfluous and anhedonic, outside the gay community. That’s what I heard on talk radio, anyway.
October 4, 2008 at 9:23 am
tf smith
I’ve been on campus this latest go-round for about three years now, and the number of professors I’ve seen wearing a coat and tie can be counted on one hand…not that I’m complaining, but it is a good example how a societal expectation has changed sharply in such a (relatively) short period of time.
Business, casual Friday and all, remains wedded to the coat and tie for men – 40-50 years ago, academia had the same dress code as business.
What was the factor that led one discipline to retain that expectation and the other to drop it almost entirely?
October 5, 2008 at 7:27 am
essear
Nixon added, “Let’s see if your politics don’t change when you’re thirty, goddamn Dicks!”