On this day in 1909, two of the least evidently funny men in American history claimed to appreciate, deeply, the jokers. President William Howard Taft told the American Press Humorists’ Association, in his most jocular vein,
Tell them for me that they can be engaged in no better vocation than making people laugh. Humor is like the buffer between two heavy railroad cars. It relieves the jolts of life. It is a shock absorber. It makes the journey through the years easier, and brightens the pathway all along the route. We Americans could not get along without humor.
I don’t want to paint with too broad a brush, but when someone tells you earnestly how important humor is, it’s because they’re not very humorous.
Taft was, perhaps, too often the butt of unfair jokes. Despite his legendary bulk, he was an energetic man; when governor of the Philippines he cabled Secretary of War Elihu Root, “Just rode a mule a hundred miles over the mountains. Feeling fine.” Which of course prompted Elihu Root to ask earnestly by cable, “Glad to hear you are well; but how is the mule?”
The other man who sent his good wishes was John D. Rockefeller, who showed a glimmering of wit by avoiding Taft’s homiletics and sticking to business:
Please present my kindest regards and best wishes to the American Press Humorists’ Association, assembled in Buffalo for their annual meeting. I regret that I cannot be present.
But then, the Times added, “Mr. Rockefeller is a member of the association.”
As a biography of Nelson Rockefeller says, “There is no accurate record to show the quality of Mr. [John D.] Rockefeller s humor,” though Nelson and the other grandsons gave a general description of the old man’s jests:
Often his stories were deadpan accounts of some sad cir
cumstance into which an acquaintance had fallen, and occasionally he would lift the napkin to wipe an imaginary tear from his eye. But the stories always ended up with an unexpected twist that made it all a huge joke and sent the children into screams of laughter.
Which sounds about right.
“Taft Praises Funny Men,” NYT 9/10/09, p. 7.


21 comments
September 9, 2008 at 3:25 am
kid bitzer
rockefeller may have been a dreadful teller of dreadful jokes, i don’t know.
but the description also matches a very skillful telling of a very good joke: ed wynne’s joke from mary poppins, at around 7:40 et seq. of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYX7bz7X8vM
weird movie as a whole, but i’ve always been impressed by this delivery. so who knows, maybe john d. was a riot.
September 9, 2008 at 5:57 am
Neddy Merrill
I didn’t know it was possible to cable a semicolon.
September 9, 2008 at 6:05 am
eric
Apparently possible.
September 9, 2008 at 6:26 am
Neddy Merrill
Excellent stop will keep in mind next time cabling you stop
September 9, 2008 at 7:30 am
Matt Weiner
No dead cat jokes!
September 9, 2008 at 8:22 am
eric
Ahoy-hoy, Neddy–as the linked manual indicates, no “stop” at the end of a message.
September 9, 2008 at 10:56 am
Nick
Is it a sign of my stunted sense of humor that dry, specific renderings of comedic tropes, e.g.
seem very funny to me? In this context, the phrase “employed it with humorous effect” is much funnier to me than the jokes it identifies.
September 9, 2008 at 10:58 am
Nick
And, dammit, that unnecessary closing quote mark is much more painful to me than the carelessness it signifies.
September 9, 2008 at 11:05 am
ben
Nick wonders whether his finding clinical discussions amusing is a sign of latent sociopathy.
September 9, 2008 at 11:11 am
ari
Latent?
September 9, 2008 at 11:18 am
ben
Yes. Nick is concerned that, in addition to the overt sociopathy he already manifests, there is more sociopathy lying in wait.
September 9, 2008 at 11:18 am
Nick
And in a flash, I have my answer.
September 9, 2008 at 1:50 pm
Josh
We get a TDIH post and it’s *not* about Admission Day? For shame.
September 9, 2008 at 2:08 pm
ben
There’s always next year.
September 9, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Sir Charles
Important WHT firsts:
1. Only incumbent president to finish third in his attempt at reelection;
2. Only man to have held jobs of president and chief justice; and
3. Only Unitarian president.
He could never be elected today. Openly opined as to the non-divine nature of Jesus. And he wasn’t joking.
September 9, 2008 at 2:12 pm
ari
ben is right. We need to retain some good material for future iterations of this day. Which isn’t to say that they’re not always manufacturing more history. And also, you could write it, Josh, if you’d like. Be the change you want to see on the blog.
September 9, 2008 at 2:14 pm
ari
*The* most important WHT first is here.
September 9, 2008 at 2:17 pm
eric
Too much flesh is bad for any man.
September 9, 2008 at 2:20 pm
Vance
It seems just that a man who denied the Trinity should finish third.
September 9, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Gene O'Grady
Not to drag family in again (ha!), but my great uncle Sheridan Baker Galloway (I think), a career employee of the bureau of engraving, was apparently a dead ringer for Taft and was often stopped on the street by people who thought he was.
September 9, 2008 at 5:18 pm
Sir Charles
ari,
I meant to mention the impressive weight.
And no. I don’t think an obese Jesus denier could ever get elected president now.
He used to summer in my home town.