Rush Limbaugh’s special guest birthday callers:
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I’m just calling along with President 41 and the former governor of Florida. We’re fixing to have lunch here, and I said, “Listen, we ought to call our pal and let him know that we care,” for you. So this is as much as anything, a nice verbal letter to a guy we really care for.
RUSH: Well, thank you, sir, very much. I’m overwhelmed. I can’t tell you how much I appreciate this and how much you’ve surprised me.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, that was the purpose of the phone call….
BUSH 41: Well, yeah. I’m kind of on the sidelines, but I can’t do golf and all that stuff anymore. But life is good. It’s wonderful, and it’s great having the family up here in Maine, and all is well. Do you see our man Ailes at all?
RUSH: Oh, yeah. I saw Roger at Tony Snow’s funeral.
BUSH 41: Oh, did you?
RUSH: And a couple of times earlier this summer.
BUSH 41: Are we on the radio, are we?
RUSH: (laughing)
BUSH 41: I didn’t know that. I’ll clean up my act here. I’m glad they told me.
Oh my. Let’s ignore, of course, the propriety of the President of the United States and one of his predecessors calling to congratulate a man who borrows rhetorical tropes from the Rwandan genocide.
Let us focus instead on “our man Ailes”—whoops, we’re on the air? Whyncha tell Poppy, kids?
Puts me in mind of the letters from Collis Huntington to Dave Colton, written while the Central Pacific were buying Senators and Congressmen with a zeal for fraudulence overshadowed only by the doings of the Union Pacific, including casual possession of eminent legislators:
While it was understood that heroic measures were used to cover up and destroy many of these incriminating missives, quite enough of them were given to the public to make it convincing that … C. P. Huntington had an active supporter in the Senate of the United States from the State of Georgia whose name was bandied about in the public places of the capitol as Huntington’s “man.”
Apparently, all our masters still own their own men at the commanding heights. And of course, it raises the issue I mentioned yesterday: it’s not just business buying politicians; sometimes it can work the other way ’round!
Via Harry Shearer, “43 visits 41.”


88 comments
August 5, 2008 at 4:38 pm
ari
There is no propriety anymore. Sad, really.
August 5, 2008 at 4:38 pm
eric
No, there’s propriety. That’s why Obama has a Ludacris problem.
August 5, 2008 at 4:39 pm
eric
Do I have to say that “propriety only matters as a stick with which to beat black people and/or liberals generally”? Or was that obvious?
August 5, 2008 at 4:41 pm
bitchphd
Lalala please wake me up when everything’s been fixed, okay?
August 5, 2008 at 4:42 pm
eric
Where, I ask you, is the outrage?
August 5, 2008 at 4:43 pm
andrew
The hilarious thing – or maybe among the hilarious things – about the Colton case – is that it came out that Colton had been embezzling money from the Associates. So his widow had already received some of the money she was suing for.
August 5, 2008 at 4:43 pm
ari
Do I have to say that “propriety only matters as a stick with which to beat black people and/or liberals generally”? Or was that obvious?
No, I got you the first time.
Lalala please wake me up when everything’s been fixed, okay?
This so perfectly sums up my mood that I’m going to spend more time at your advice kiosk: “The Doctor is In, $.05″.
August 5, 2008 at 4:45 pm
bitchphd
THE PRESIDENT: President George W. Bush calling to congratulate you on 20 years of important and excellent broadcasting.
AARRGGHH.
There’s some outrage for you, Eric.
August 5, 2008 at 4:45 pm
bitchphd
“The Doctor is In, $.05″
Oh, that’s perfect.
August 5, 2008 at 4:46 pm
ari
Yeah, I’m so angry I’m gritting my teeth. But I think I might puke. So I’d better unclench my jaw.
Huh, that sums up the last seven years for me.
August 5, 2008 at 4:46 pm
eric
it came out that Colton had been embezzling money from the Associates
Yeah, as I understand it she signed a deal with them giving up her stock in the Central Pacific in exchange for them walking away from the promissory note he’d signed, and letting the embezzling alone. Then she got ticked because it turned out the stock was worth more than she thought, and she sued. She lost, but the letters were awesome.
August 5, 2008 at 4:47 pm
eric
that sums up the last seven years for me.
Honestly, I’ve been less nauseated many times over the past seven years than this makes me.
August 5, 2008 at 4:48 pm
eric
Oh, also, everyone knows Roger Ailes runs Fox News, right? Did I have to put that in the post, too?
August 5, 2008 at 4:48 pm
eric
Say, what if I just keep writing this post down here in the comments, will anyone care?
August 5, 2008 at 4:50 pm
ari
Say, what if I just keep writing this post down here in the comments, will anyone care?
It’s, like, pomo performance art.
(Is all performance art pomo?)
August 5, 2008 at 4:50 pm
Jason B
Can’t they even pretend to be decent human beings anymore?
My brain is throwing sparks. I cna’t oiin.sgintg gbnhweowlg .
August 5, 2008 at 4:51 pm
andrew
The Huntington correspondence I’ve read (roughly 1865-1873) has a fair amount of stuff like that.* I should read the Colton letters for entertainment (they were outside of my research time period).
*Including discussions of California (one-term) Senator Cornelius Cole’s reliability. There was some debate over whether it was a good idea to do favors for him before he took action in return.
August 5, 2008 at 4:52 pm
andrew
Oh, also, everyone knows Roger Ailes runs Fox News, right?
And he worked on Nixon’s campaign doing tv image stuff.
August 5, 2008 at 4:52 pm
eric
It’s, like, pomo performance art.
No, that would be if I were doing it en déshabille. And as we know I have a crude but extant summertime dress code.
August 5, 2008 at 4:54 pm
ari
Oops, I think your via link needs to be re-routed.
August 5, 2008 at 4:54 pm
bitchphd
Continuing the blog post in the comments thread is what all the best blogs do. Until they start going downhill, and then they don’t.
August 5, 2008 at 4:56 pm
eric
I think your via link needs to be re-routed.
Oops, yes. Fixed.
August 5, 2008 at 4:56 pm
eric
Continuing the blog post in the comments thread is what all the best blogs do
Also, continually fixing all the typos in the post.
August 5, 2008 at 4:57 pm
ari
And seriously, I just read this post again, and I’m ready to rassle a bear or something. Plus, I just looked over at TPM for the first time today (this is a record for me, not checking in until the end of business), and it seems that John volunteered Cindy to perform in an amateur stripping contest (there’s video). My propriety has fallen, and it can’t get up.
Really, how can this election even be close? And no, I don’t want an answer to that question.
August 5, 2008 at 4:58 pm
eric
how can this election even be close
<whispers> Barack Obama is black.
August 5, 2008 at 4:59 pm
eric
no, I don’t want an answer to that question
Oh, sorry.
August 5, 2008 at 5:00 pm
ari
I said I didn’t want an answer.
So, here’s a fun game to play: If you were a Canadian citizen, would you consider moving to Canada if McCain wins the election? Not because of the short-, middle-, and long-term harm he’ll do to the Republic and the world. But because of what a McCain victory will say about your fellow citizens.
August 5, 2008 at 5:01 pm
eric
If you were a Canadian citizen
Look, if you’re too yellow to decide to flee on your own, you can’t dragoon us into envying you for it.
August 5, 2008 at 5:02 pm
bitchphd
That John McCain, such a classy guy.
August 5, 2008 at 5:03 pm
bitchphd
would you consider moving to Canada if McCain wins the election?
No. Because the Republic freaking needs some conscientious objectors to stick around and raise their voices.
August 5, 2008 at 5:04 pm
eric
That John McCain, such a classy guy.
If that episode doesn’t turn all the PUMAs around, there is no justice.
August 5, 2008 at 5:04 pm
andrew
Incidentally, I learned recently that UBC has a really good library science program.
August 5, 2008 at 5:06 pm
ari
Ah, UBC, such nice views of the sound. And such a fine history department. Erm, are we on the radio?
August 5, 2008 at 5:08 pm
ari
I think* I just learned that my TLS review of Drew Faust’s book is about to be published (finally). So that’s the end of my career. Maybe they don’t get the TLS in Canada.
And no, I’m not willing to stop using this comment thread as an internet chat room with my imaginary friends. So don’t even bother asking, Eric.
* It’s a bit confusing.
August 5, 2008 at 5:09 pm
bitchphd
Well yes, UBC *is* truly lovely. I had a former student who went to their library science program.
August 5, 2008 at 5:10 pm
eric
So don’t even bother asking, Eric.
Neddy told me I no longer have any authority here. Which is fine.
U of T is very nice. <ahem> Is this thing on?
August 5, 2008 at 5:10 pm
Vance Maverick
For you would-be Canadians (h/t Jezebel).
August 5, 2008 at 5:11 pm
andrew
From Vance’s link:
Why is it always those with blond hair who get the most scrutiny at the border?
August 5, 2008 at 5:11 pm
eric
For you would-be Canadians
You’re just trying to up the nausea quotient, aren’t you, Vance?
August 5, 2008 at 5:14 pm
eric
So that’s the end of my career.
Since we’re just talking, I see no reason this should be true.
August 5, 2008 at 5:18 pm
Ted Margadant
Ari, would you stop by my office?
August 5, 2008 at 5:20 pm
eric
Hey, no impersonations, “Ted”.
August 5, 2008 at 5:20 pm
ac
Michael Bublé should still be on the market, since his break-up with Emily Blunt. If one took up with him, one could live in Canada and be serenaded with Lou Rawls’ covers on a regular basis.
August 5, 2008 at 5:22 pm
eric
You’re just trying to up the nausea quotient, aren’t you, ac?
August 5, 2008 at 5:26 pm
Jason B
My friends, it’s time we allow offshore nausea drilling so the American nausea quotient no longer has to rely on imported nausea. My friends.
August 5, 2008 at 5:35 pm
urbino
Honestly, I don’t quite get all the hubbub. Is there something in this post-presidential nipple slip that we didn’t already know?
August 5, 2008 at 5:37 pm
urbino
and be serenaded with Lou Rawls’ covers on a regular basis.
Lou Rawls: accept no substitutes. (Likewise for John.)
August 5, 2008 at 5:38 pm
Jason B
Yeah, but you should hear John covering “A Natural Man.” Whew.
August 5, 2008 at 5:46 pm
JPool
He does so very pragmatically.
August 5, 2008 at 5:47 pm
urbino
The boy can wail. No doubt.
August 5, 2008 at 5:48 pm
bitchphd
It’s not the not-knowing. It’s the utter shamelessness.
August 5, 2008 at 5:48 pm
JPool
Sigh. I should know not to attempt philosphy jokes.
August 5, 2008 at 5:57 pm
Michael Elliott
I’ve always thought Vancouver would be a great place to build an American Studies dept. Seriously. On the other hand, if you are going to flee, you could follow the real money to Qatar.
August 5, 2008 at 6:10 pm
Jason B
I laughed.
August 5, 2008 at 6:12 pm
bitchphd
I stopped by campus today to see if any of the exam copies I’d ordered were in, but I still don’t have a mailbox, and the receptionist in the mail area told me that that means my books might have been returned, if they’d arrived. Sigh.
Anyway, the real point is that I was wearing a pair of short shorts made from some sweats I owned in *high school* and once cut the legs off of with a pocket knife while driving through Yuma with my dad in a truck with no a/c. Those and a gray tshirt. Because I am the fashion diva of the internetical academia.
August 5, 2008 at 6:14 pm
eric
I was wearing a pair of short shorts
OK, Neddy, what if I wear short shorts?
August 5, 2008 at 6:19 pm
bitchphd
They have to be cutoffs made from twenty-year-old sweatpants, Eric.
August 5, 2008 at 6:21 pm
bitchphd
Crap, more like twenty-five-year old sweatpants, come to think of it.
August 5, 2008 at 6:30 pm
eric
Do you have some I could borrow?
August 5, 2008 at 6:34 pm
bitchphd
You can borrow mine, if you drive up here and get ‘em. I’m sure they’d be as fetching on you as they are on me.
It’s okay that they say “St. Mary’s” on one leg, isn’t it?
August 5, 2008 at 6:34 pm
ben wolfson
And as we know I have a crude but extant summertime dress code.
“Extant”? “extant”? I mean, I don’t doubt it’s extant, if you have it, but what are you really trying to convey, here?
August 5, 2008 at 6:35 pm
bitchphd
up, down, whatever. Actually I’ll be in your neck of the woods next Tuesday. Ish.
August 5, 2008 at 6:35 pm
eric
It’s okay that they say “St. Mary’s” on one leg
It’s better. For a while I had a DG sweatshirt.
I’ve said too much.
August 5, 2008 at 6:36 pm
eric
what are you really trying to convey, here?
That I don’t do unclothed performance art?
August 5, 2008 at 6:36 pm
bitchphd
OMG, I’m shocked. Shocked and horrified. I should deliver you my St. Mary’s shorts asap.
August 5, 2008 at 6:40 pm
ben wolfson
Right, I got that through the not-déshabille, has-a-dress-code thing. But I would expect your dress code to be described as “extant” if, in 2057, it could still be located, or something. There’s something a little bizarre about describing a contemporary document as extant.
August 5, 2008 at 6:42 pm
ben wolfson
I do all of my performance art clothed, and that, in fact, is the performance in which my art consists.
August 5, 2008 at 7:30 pm
bitchphd
Shocked by the DG sweatshirt. Not the fact that Eric remains clothed at all times.
August 5, 2008 at 7:34 pm
ari
I knew that Eric had rushed Delta Gamma. I’m just surprised he got in. Well, maybe it was a borrowed sweatshirt.
August 5, 2008 at 7:40 pm
eric
There’s something a little bizarre about describing a contemporary document as extant
Born of my youthful principle, it has thus far survived the ravages of middle-aged eccentricity. It is extant.
August 5, 2008 at 7:40 pm
eric
maybe it was a borrowed sweatshirt
It was not mine. That is why the ever-proper B is shocked.
August 5, 2008 at 8:13 pm
Josh
(Is all performance art pomo?)
No, some of it is Miwok or Ohlone.
Thank you, I’ll be here all week.
August 5, 2008 at 8:18 pm
Vance Maverick
Nyuk nyuk. More broadly, the answer is generally yes, but the roots of performance art go far enough back (Zürich 1916 and all that) to complicate the classification.
August 5, 2008 at 9:16 pm
JPool
We all wish that we could have been in Zurich in 1916.
I do, anyway.
August 5, 2008 at 9:23 pm
Vance Maverick
More American-ly, I would point to Black Mountain College, where around 1950 John Cage and others gave performances foreshadowing the performance-art explosion of the ’60s. This was during the rectorship of Charles Olson, who among many other things is said to have been the first to use the term “postmodern”. (I don’t know if anyone claims that Lyotard etc. got it from him.)
August 5, 2008 at 9:32 pm
JPool
Sure, if you want actual genealogy, rather than much cooler precedent (my hazy understanding is that the rediscovery of Dada came more in the 1970s and 1980s).
I’m hoping that the ghost of Kurt Schwitters shows up at one of the Fringe Festival shows I go to this week.
August 5, 2008 at 9:39 pm
Vance Maverick
Cage certainly knew about Dada — in the preface to Silence (1961) he writes as if it were a common reference point.
August 5, 2008 at 10:05 pm
JPool
I’m just sayin that Tristan Tsara and Sophie Tauber seem like more fun to hang around with than John Cage.
August 5, 2008 at 10:16 pm
JPool
More seriously, Dada performance art, while modernist in its political ideology, was post-modern in its aesthetics and methods.
August 5, 2008 at 10:17 pm
Vance Maverick
Hmm, a little difficult to assess at this remove. Cage was an intensely social being, a fount of various anecdote.
August 5, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Vance Maverick
(10:17 to 10:05.)
August 5, 2008 at 10:20 pm
grackle
“I was wearing a pair of short shorts made from some sweats I owned in *high school* and once cut the legs off of with a pocket knife while driving through Yuma with my dad in a truck with no a/c.”
Speaking of Dada, isn’t this a line from a Jerry Jeff Walker song?
August 6, 2008 at 5:14 am
Jason B
Reads a bit like Tom Waits doing young adult fiction.
August 6, 2008 at 5:44 am
silbey
Oh, so now it _is_ a new Gilded Age? Hah.
August 6, 2008 at 6:12 am
eric
I said “yes and no,” didn’t I?
August 6, 2008 at 6:36 am
[links] Link Salad ere I light out for the WorldCon territories | jlake.com
[...] Our Gilded Age — The Edge of the American West with a transcript of Bush 41 and Bush 43 talking to Rush Limbaugh. Note the reference to “Our man Ailes.” That would be the same Ailes who is the news director of “fair and balanced” FOX News. Yep, no bias at that network — just ask any conservative! (Note for those who are not media geeks: Ailes was one of Reagan’s key campaign strategists. Nowhere in the ‘liberal’ media will you find a Democrat of similar stature working as a news director.) [...]
August 6, 2008 at 9:36 am
TF Smith
Dr. B, did you use to drive a flat bed Ford?
August 6, 2008 at 1:21 pm
urbino
I said “yes and no,” didn’t I?
Get off the fence, Rauchway. This is wartime.