![]() |
On this day in 1874, Harper’s Weekly ran the above cartoon. As recently as mid century, bison, roaming in herds across the continent’s midsection, had numbered somewhere between 30 and 200 million. By 1874, though, many observers assumed the animals, along with the Plains Indians who depended on them for survival, would soon disappear from the American scene, a species and a race vanishing because of the impact of industrialization and white settlement throughout the West.
Buffalo robes became a hot commodity in the 1850s, when settlers, pouring into Kansas Territory, began hunting bison for sport. But it was the arrival of the railroad — it always is in Western history, isn’t it? — following the Civil War, that pushed the species toward the tipping point. The railroads needed to feed workers who laid their tracks. And market hunters were happy to provide relatively cheap bison meat. At the same time, more railroads meant more settlers in the region, better access to eastern markets, and greater demand than ever for hides. Eventually, the railroads also realized that the bison themselves were a tourist attraction. And riders marveled at the great, shaggy beasts and sometimes shot them from trains.
Bison robes were prized for their durability and their warmth, qualities that made them especially useful in the West. Then, starting early in the 1870s, tanneries in the United States and Europe began using bison hides for leather. Because of this new commercial application for the animals’ skins, coupled with the widespread availability of more accurate rifles, the slaughter accelerated. By the mid 1870s, the bison had largely disappeared from their range on the southern plains.
In 1871, R. C. McCormick, a delegate to congress from the Arizona Territory, introduced legislation to protect the bison. Like the animals themselves, his bill died. McCormick, undeterred, tried again the following year, lobbying his colleagues by showing gruesome images of piles of bison carcasses, stripped of their hides, rotting in the sun. Finally, in 1874, congress passed legislation protecting the animals. President Grant, though, listened to his old friend and trusted adviser, General William T. Sherman, who insisted that the destruction of the bison would hasten the end of the Indian wars in the West. With the buffalo gone, Sherman argued, the Plains Indians would be forced to assimilate; they would have to embrace sedentary agriculture. Grant vetoed the bill. The hunt continued.
A decade later, just a few hundred bison, a small herd located near Yellowstone National Park, were still alive in the United States. Somewhere, Kevin Costner just shed a tear. Or maybe he thought of a great idea for a sequel.



9 comments
June 7, 2008 at 12:14 am
urbino
I didn’t know Teddy Roosevelt had a beard. Still, those teddy buffalo are darn cute.
June 7, 2008 at 5:30 am
matt w
Or maybe he thought of a great idea for a sequel.
YOU TAKE THIS POST DOWN NOW, BEFORE THE HARM IS DONE.
June 7, 2008 at 5:57 am
ari
Fair point. But what’s done is done.
June 7, 2008 at 7:24 am
The Modesto Kid
two species
Plains Indian is not a species.
June 7, 2008 at 12:08 pm
Vance Maverick
I think of this (not the cartoon, that is, or the movie, but the near-extinction) every time I pass our triste little clutch of buffalo in Golden Gate Park, lurking behind a fence. At least they fared better than the passenger pigeon.
(Tangentially, you’ve sized this image at width=420 — but its intrinsic width is 460. Editing the page at home, I find it looks better at its ‘natural’ size — does WP let you do that?)
June 7, 2008 at 12:45 pm
ari
People thought they were at the time, MK. That was one of the most pernicious elements of racial pseudoscience. And Vance, I have no idea. As you know, I’m profoundly incompetent.
June 7, 2008 at 1:03 pm
Cala
Yeah, I thought about mentioning that, too, Modesto Kid. It klingt a little clunky.
June 7, 2008 at 1:29 pm
The Modesto Kid
People thought they were at the time
Good point — and I was trying to figure out, before I posted that comment, if that sentence in your post could be read as in the voice of the Harper’s cartoonist. But it definitely sounds like your voice, in the present day. Not a big deal (particularly in this informal, evanescent medium).
June 7, 2008 at 1:37 pm
ari
Hmm, the offending sentence includes the words, “many observers at the time…” And then it goes on to talk about the potential for extinction of the bison and the Plains tribes. I thought that it was clear enough that the rest of the sentence reflected the perspective of the contemporary observers. But, upon reading your critiques, MK and Cala, I suppose the following would be better: “By 1874, though, many observers assumed the animals, along with the Plains Indians who depended on them for survival, would soon disappear from the American scene, a species AND A RACE vanishing because of the impact of industrialization and white settlement throughout the West.” I actually think I’m going to make that change to avoid further confusion. Thanks to you both.