This post by Robert Farley gets it exactly right. Boys don’t grow up knowing this stuff, they seek it out, or they get it in the classroom. Girls can too. Even after adulthood. There’s no shame in studying up on something you don’t know.
Farley’s further point that experience teaches pretty well too seems right also. If only there were a moral equivalent of war that would give people a low nonsense threshold for policy matters. Or at least a course. Why, perhaps economists could take it, maybe from economic historians.


4 comments
March 20, 2008 at 8:35 am
rja
If only there were a moral equivalent of war
Well, there is this
And it’s also good for “that more intelligent sort of girl who likes boys’ games and books.” Maybe it could be made part of No Child Left Behind.
March 20, 2008 at 9:54 am
John B.
Math is Hard!!
March 20, 2008 at 2:40 pm
John Emerson
Most women don’t understand that when a bomb hits a wedding party and kill 15 people, it’s unfortunate of course, but sort of funny too. That’s why they don’t understand strategy.
Except Ms. Slaughter. When Anne Marie Flowergarden adopted a new last name, people in the biz knew that she had what it takes.
March 20, 2008 at 3:51 pm
Megan
It is hard to make chicks understand about bombs and weddings, especially when they’re all crying and stuff.
Emerson, you’re doing hard labor over there at C.T. Nice job.