Hey look, Eric’s in the Times. Saying smart things about immigration:
Mr. Rauchway, the historian, argues that the ultimate failure of anti-immigrant politics is part of a larger failure of class-based politics in the United States. Running against the rich — or the poor — has rarely worked in this country. Instead, immigrant-bashing has been most successful when it tapped into broader racial fears, as it did in both the 1850s and the 1920s. Notably, the economy was booming in the ’20s.
“As it becomes less and less acceptable to be racist,” Mr. Rauchway said, “immigration is not going to be as politically effective.”
Polling data supports this argument. In a New York Times/CBS News poll conducted last May — in the midst of the debate over the immigration bill — 57 percent of respondents said that most recent immigrants contributed to this country, up from 34 percent when the question was asked in 1986. Only 28 percent in last year’s poll said that most immigrants caused problems, down from 44 percent in 1986. The Gallup Poll also shows increasing sympathy for immigrants.
I’ve always thought of Eric as an historian. Or even a historian. But if the Times wants to promote him to singular status, the historian, that’s fine by me. Because he’s really quite good. Failing to mention the blog, though, that’s not okay.


31 comments
March 2, 2008 at 12:08 pm
bitchphd
Admit it. You’re green with envy.
March 2, 2008 at 1:20 pm
charlieford
Don’t look now, but he’s been demoted. Not quite sure, but the way I heard it, it was sort of a Chuck Connors-”Branded” scenario: Rauchway walks dejectedly thru the dust, and Bill Keller stares him down, finally ripping the definite article from his chest, breaking it over his knee and tossing it in the dust.
March 2, 2008 at 1:34 pm
bitchphd
I think he’s “a historian” in the first reference, and “the” in a later one, actually.
March 2, 2008 at 1:47 pm
charlieford
Oops.
March 2, 2008 at 2:08 pm
eric
B is right, which means of course that the usage is much less flattering than my colleague suggests. If it were “Eric Rauchway, the historian” on first mention, then it would be as if I were somebody you should already know, or else one of two well-known Eric Rauchways (”I mean Eric Rauchway the historian, not Eric Rauchway the deep-sea diver”).
But as it’s “Eric Rauchway, a historian,” followed a dozen or so paragraphs later by “Mr. Rauchway, the historian,” the use of the definite article means “Mr. Rauchway, the historian guy we were talking about so many column-inches ago (remember?)”
At least I think it does.
I would be interested to know why we have “Rauchway, a historian at the University of California, Davis” but “Ngai, a Columbia University historian”. I have a hunch they prefer the latter formulation—saves a couple words—but they found it awkward to write, “a University of California, Davis, historian”.
March 2, 2008 at 2:17 pm
LizardBreath
Fascinatingly, the title of the webpage refers to the effect of immigration on the ‘ballet’ box. Overcrowding, perhaps, as they buy up all the orchestra seats?
March 2, 2008 at 2:18 pm
eric
Blahdy foreigners, comin’ over ’ere, fillin’ up Sadler’s Wells.
March 2, 2008 at 4:40 pm
urbino
I now question whether “Rauchway” actually exists. Is he the Keyser Söze of the history profession? Ari the Verbal Kint?
March 2, 2008 at 4:42 pm
eric
Them’s fightin’ words, gin-boy.
March 2, 2008 at 4:54 pm
ari
Not only are Eric Rauchway and I two different people, but Ari Kelman and I are two different people. It gets confusing around these here parts.
March 2, 2008 at 5:03 pm
urbino
Sure, sure. Do I look like Chazz Palminteri to you?
Them’s fightin’ words, gin-boy.
Bring it, Casper. These colors don’t run.
March 2, 2008 at 5:07 pm
ari
What happened to Chazz Palminteri? There was a decent sized window, say between 1995 and 2000, when he was in every movie. Did he make someone mad after that, pull a Val Kilmer? Or something else?
March 2, 2008 at 5:13 pm
eric
Bring it, Casper
Oh, it’s done been brought. “Friendly,” my tuchis.
March 2, 2008 at 5:25 pm
urbino
Sorry if I missed it. I’ve been giggling uncontrollably since typing, “These colors don’t run.”
What happened to Chazz Palminteri?
People realized he couldn’t act, maybe?
March 2, 2008 at 5:29 pm
eric
I’ve been giggling uncontrollably since typing, “These colors don’t run.”
I’m assuming you lint-heads are allowed to say stuff like that.
March 2, 2008 at 6:11 pm
urbino
Oh, we encourage everybody to say it. And by “everybody” I mean, of course, Americans. Duh. If we could just get you California egghead socialist America-haters on the program, the world would finally be safe from . . . something.
March 2, 2008 at 6:19 pm
eric
the world would finally be safe from . . . something
Almonds? Avocados? Dignity?
March 2, 2008 at 6:25 pm
urbino
Yes. And SmartCars. God bless America.
March 2, 2008 at 6:32 pm
eric
And SmartCars
I thought those came from a German car company. Which means they’re probably manufactured in Tuscaloosa.
March 2, 2008 at 6:40 pm
urbino
They’re foreign and small. That’s all any reasonable American needs to know to recognize them as an existential threat. The fact that I have to explain this to you confirms my point that you California types are the soft underbelly in our global war on radical smallism.
March 2, 2008 at 6:41 pm
urbino
our global war on radical smallism…
and foreignness.
March 2, 2008 at 7:01 pm
bitchphd
What, you want foreigners should be *bigger* than Americans?
I suspect you of secret America-hating sympathies. I mean, look at your pseudonym. “Urbino”? Is that anything like “urban”? Hmm?
March 2, 2008 at 7:13 pm
urbino
I use that to make myself more palatable to those I’m trying to convert to true America-lovingness. Like St. Paul, I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might win some.
March 2, 2008 at 7:54 pm
rootlesscosmo
At last report, Chazz Palminteri was appearing in New York in a solo version of his play “A Bronx Tale,” which was made into a movie some years ago, with him and Robert deNiro in the cast. Pretty good movie, too, but the review I saw of the solo show was negative.
March 2, 2008 at 8:02 pm
andrew
This post title makes me think of Ben Franklin.
March 2, 2008 at 8:02 pm
ari
From the big screen to off-Broadway productions. Sounds like it’s time for an episode of Behind the Music.
March 2, 2008 at 8:03 pm
ari
How so, Andrew? Is it my stylish turn of phrase? I’m thinking not.
March 2, 2008 at 8:10 pm
urbino
Because of Ben’s dalliances with various ladies in Paris?
March 2, 2008 at 9:00 pm
teofilo
Also his thoughts on gray cats, presumably.
March 2, 2008 at 9:20 pm
bitchphd
Like St. Paul, I have become all things to all people
I kind of prefer Minneapolis, myself.
March 3, 2008 at 8:30 pm
andrew
teo gets it right.