![]() |
On this day in 1925 The New Yorker first appeared, and every year the magazine’s editors mark the august anniversary by reiterating in appropriate fashion the picture of dandy Eustace Tilley, who graced the first cover. Though he became an institution, Tilley started as a joke, a man self-evidently out of tune with The New Yorker, with America, and indeed with 1925.
If the city’s new voice had a real face it was this one: the tough but humorous map belonging to Harold Ross, the New Yorker‘s first editor. He came from Colorado and worked as a reporter and photographer in San Francisco and Atlanta. He spent time also in Panama and, maybe most important, edited the Army’s newspaper, Stars and Stripes. Which is by way of saying, he knew the West, the South, the new cities, the new army and the new colonies—the ingredients that, when added to an acquaintance with the capital of capital, New York City, would give you an excellent working understanding of modern America.
Fortune gave this account of his virtues:
There are two things that measure Ross’s genius. One was the fact that he never deluded himself on how little he knew—and he learns some things rapidly; the other was his sublime dissatisfaction with everything and everyone as he battered his way to what he was after but did not know how to ask for. He is not a large man, but he is a furious and a mad one. Men left The New Yorker for sanitariums, they had fits on the floor, they wept, they offered to punch his nose (he is terrified of physical violence). But he kept on hiring and firing blindly. By hit or miss he found the individuals who could articulate his ideas—and who could stand the pace of his temperament.
One of the men he might have driven crazy was his big backer, yeast magnate Raoul Fleischmann. But Fleischmann stuck out the flat first years and became a successful publisher by 1927. And the talent accreted with agreeable speed around Ross; within a couple years of starting he had Katharine Angell, James Thurber, and E. B. White. He liked lean, clear writing and disliked dirty jokes. Infamous cover aside, he created an institution that belonged not just to the metropolis but to the nation and indeed the world.



15 comments
February 21, 2008 at 10:08 am
rootlesscosmo
Ross’ well-known aversion to dirty jokes fostered a competition among New Yorker writers to smuggle sexual allusions past his sharp, but unsophisticated, smut-detector. One example: in a parody of SatEvePost fiction, S.J. Perelman wrote “Young they were, absurdly young… brave, defiant of the world, lazing the days away. All both of them wanted was a little nook.” (from “Entered as Second-class Matter.”)
February 21, 2008 at 10:31 am
Vance Maverick
I think we can tie this together with the previous post, to reflect on the meaning of New York as cultural lodestar for the rest of the country. I don’t know what the New Yorker has meant to New York — perhaps a certain uptown complacency — but for the provinces, it has been a beacon of aspiring sophistication. I remember Herb Caen, a provincial from Sacramento proud to have made it in “the City” (i.e. San Francisco), revealing as much when he complained in the early ’90s about the low quality of some of the cartoons then turning up in the NYer. (This was before the discovery of the one true caption for all the cartoons.) For another path toward the center, consider Pauline Kael: from the sticks of Sonoma County to Berkeley, to New York and the same magazine.
February 21, 2008 at 11:11 am
charlieford
See Ann Douglas, TERRIBLE HONESTY, on NYC. Great book. With some really frustrating, long, weird digressions. Still, worth the effort.
February 21, 2008 at 11:35 am
bitchphd
for the provinces, it has been a beacon of aspiring sophistication
Oh, absolutely. So much so that I’m a little embarrassed about subscribing to it.
February 21, 2008 at 11:42 am
urbino
Any mention of the Harold Ross-era New Yorker prompts me to say: E.B. White rools.
It’s a reflex.
February 21, 2008 at 1:00 pm
eric
E.B. White rools.
It’s true.
February 21, 2008 at 1:08 pm
KRT
And leave us not forget Mr. Robert Benchley while we are listing Mr. Ross’ jools of rool.
If only I could have experienced “Abie’s Irish Rose.” (Or is it still running?)
February 21, 2008 at 8:15 pm
urbino
It’s true.
Troo.
February 21, 2008 at 8:23 pm
eric
I never claimed to be hip.
February 21, 2008 at 8:37 pm
urbino
Oh, I didn’t know it was hip (if it is). I was just playing out the string.
February 21, 2008 at 10:14 pm
Vance Maverick
B, I grew up reading the NYer, and I subscribe still. I might pick different icons from its past (Ashbery, Barthelme, McPhee), but it’s a good magazine. And more.
February 21, 2008 at 10:55 pm
bitchphd
It’s totally a good magazine, which is why I subscribe. But when I was a kid it was high-brow that my folks got Time.
February 22, 2008 at 6:07 am
FL
You know who he looks like, don’t you? That’s right: Gil Thorp.
February 22, 2008 at 6:28 am
standpipe
I think he looks like a physicist. He has physicist hair. I have the whole NYer on DVD thing, and I have found subtle lampoons of Ernest Rutherford’s atomic model throughout the earlier editions.
February 22, 2008 at 6:45 am
eric
Technically, Gil Thorp looks like Harold Ross.