If you have a chance some day, drive north from Denver to the Little Bighorn Battlefield, the site of George Armstrong Custer’s demise. You won’t be disappointed. It’s an amazing trip through a desolate country, filled with more antelope than people. Out of your driver’s-side window, for most of the way, you’ll see the eastern face of the Rockies. And the Great Plains will stretch to the horizon when you glance to your right. Regardless of which view you choose, it’s hard not to feel tiny amdist the enormity of the West.
About four hours out of Denver, as you approach the town of Buffalo, Wyoming, the scenery becomes spectacular. A sea of pines rises to your left, the Bighorn National Forest, and you’ll find yourself surrounded by craggy hills in one instant and lovely valleys the next. Streams, absent for most of the ride, lace the landscape. This is the western edge of the Powder River Country.
Just after you pass through Buffalo, keep your eyes open, or you’ll miss it: the Fetterman battlefield. On this day in 1866 something happened there. But, as I’ve tried to write this post throughout the day, I’ve realized that I don’t know exactly what. More than that, I’ve been reminded that I have very little idea what happened at almost any point in the so-called Indian Wars, the final stage of the federal government’s effort to dispossess the tribes of the Great Plains.
What I do know, or what I can find out without any trouble, are the names of the white officers who fought in those wars. It’s also easy enough for me to learn precisely the kinds of guns they carried: their caliber, their range, their make and model. And sometimes, though less often than you might expect, I can dig a bit deeper and figure out which Indian people were present at a given fight. But all of this information obscures more than it reveals.
I have no idea, for instance, why Captain William Fetterman and his commanding officer, Colonel Henry Carrington, were stationed at Fort Phil Kearny on December 21, 1866. Which is to say, I know that they were there so that civilization could take root in the region, replacing savagery. Carrington, Fetterman, and the men under them were supposed to ensure that miners could make their way to the gold fields in Montana, despite the fine print in the Treaty of 1865, which ostensibly set aside that area for Native people. But I don’t know much about Carrington or Fetterman, who their political allies were, and who, in Washington, decided that whites would take that territory at that time. More important, I know next to nothing about the political context underlying those decisions. I also know very little about Red Cloud, the Oglala chief who made his stand in the Powder River Country, inspiring the warriors who killed Fetterman and the troops who rode out with him on this day in 1866. As for those Indian warriors, their stories, for the moment at least, are shrouded by the mists of time.
So who’s going to rewrite the history of the Indian Wars, to pick up the project Elliot West has already begun? I’m not taking anything away from the work of Robert Utley, Jerry Greene, and other military historians like them. Those scholars have done excellent research and crafted gripping narratives. But they’ve ignored some significant questions: about racial formation and anxiety, about cultural production and transmission, and about politics of all kinds.
My colleagues Louis Warren and Eric both tell me that Heather Cox Richardson is writing a history of Wounded Knee. That’s welcome news. Perhaps she’ll next turn her attention to a survey of the wars leading up to that tragedy. If she, or someone of her skill, doesn’t, I just might have to. Otherwise, the next time I stop at the Fetterman battlefield, I’ll be as clueless as I was the last time: captivated by the enormity of the scene arrayed before me, and aware of some of the fine-grained details, but totally ignorant of what it all means.


12 comments
December 22, 2007 at 2:02 am
Ben Alpers
The Bighorn Mountains are really some of the most beautiful scenery in North America. One of my favorite drives in the entire country is going west to east across the Bighorns in Wyoming on US 14 (this is north of Buffalo, WY, about which Ari writes). You climb up into the mountains, cross through beautiful high country and then suddenly the mountains fall away and the plains spread out ahead as far as the eye can see.
If you ever find yourself driving east across northern Wyoming, don’t miss this drive!
December 22, 2007 at 3:49 am
ari
Here’s a cool site that allows visitors to follow the length of Wyoming’s highways, actually highways throughout the Rocky Mountain region. (I’m blogging a “cool” highway site at 4 AM — so quick is the descent into nerd hell). The site’s aesthetics, typified by its entry for Highway 14, the road Ben so admires, appear to be almost willfully odd, favoring road signs versus spectacular scenery. But that’s part of its charm, I guess, especially if you fancy the juxtapostion of built and natural environments.
December 22, 2007 at 4:27 am
Ben Alpers
What a strange site that is, Ari!
The part of US-14 I mentioned is between Graybull and Dayton (a map is here). US-14A (going east from Lovell) is also very attractive.
The closest thing on that Wyoming highway site to showing any of these roads is this lovely shot of the sign at the junction between 14 and 14A, which is in the middle of the Bighorns.
December 22, 2007 at 7:46 pm
Larry Cebula
I am reading a book right now that would make a fine companion on this road trip: Where Custer Fell. It is a neat collection of very early photographs of the LBH battlefield, some taken only two years after Custer’s death, combined with modern rephotography of some of the images and historical analysis.
As to your comment on the need to rewrite the Indian Wars, ahem brother. There is some interesting stuff with some of the colonialists, most notably Jill Lepore’s The Name of War. If I ever get back to being a historian I want to do exactly the kind of thing you have in mind, an ethnohistory of the Northwest Indians wars of the 1840s-70s. The source material is mostly there (though the Indian side is tough after the missionaries get kicked out).
December 23, 2007 at 10:23 am
idontpay
Fascinating to see the “gender politics” take on Western conflict history the link I found and posted in the other thread took. I grew taking Libby Custer and Margaret Carrington as assertive, effective women of their day, and Absaroka, Home of the Crows is usually taken as a very important witness. Evan Connell’s Son of the Morning Star, for instance, isn’t very pro-Libby, but often quotes Absaroka. This really feels new to me.
December 23, 2007 at 11:05 am
ari
I just found an inexpensive used copy of Where Custer Fell online. Thanks, Larry. I’m looking forward to reading it when I return from vacation. IDP, have you looked Elliot West’s Contested Plains (link above)? If not, you might really enjoy it. It’s a great book: well argued, built atop a variety of different kinds of evidence, and beautifully written. I think it’s probably the best of the new histories of the Indian Wars. At least the best that I’ve seen.
December 23, 2007 at 10:14 pm
Larry Cebula
Ari: I quite agree on Eliot West, he is also a peach of a guy.
Military history is in such disfavor in the academy that it is going to take a while for a new history of the Indian Wars to come around. We need the same people who write about the fur trade and missions to take their stories forward a couple of generations, and to apply ethno-historical methods to both sides of the battlefield.
December 23, 2007 at 10:22 pm
ari
That’s a good point, though I do think that the Indian Wars might get its new history sooner than you imply. Why? There’s gold in them there hills (forgive me). What I mean is that there’s money in writing about war, some money in writing about Native people (a huge market in Germany, for some reason), and a bit of money in writing about the West. And so it seems likely that someone will follow the revenue stream sooner rather than later.
But if nobody does, I assure you that as soon as I finish my current book project (on the politics of memory surrounding the Sand Creek massacre) and the next one (on the Cherokees between removal and Reconstruction), I’ll do it myself. But I expect to be scooped long before then. At least I hope so.
December 24, 2007 at 9:27 am
idontpay
Let me back up Ari’s point about there being Gold in…
I remember about twenty-five years ago, when I still subscribed to the New Republic, Kinsley once opined that there was no widespread interest in reading anyway, particularly among men, and that the notion that books had impact beyond small circles was illusory. In the very next issue, Ann Hulbert disagreed and offered the following anecdote: she’d just been at a barbecue where one unlikely middle-aged guy was holding about three others’ rapt attention by retelling a description he’d just read in Son of the Morning Star.
In those days I used to ride the commuter train up the North Shore, and saw just this all the time. I would sometimes start a conversation with some solid citizen who had just put down Eagle Against the Sun, for instance, and found the comprehension and background knowledge, the sense that rather than wanting an old boyish enthusiasm refreshed, they were usually curious, from whatever political or social perspective, about how contemporary scholarship was reshaping the understanding of well-known stories. Not too long ago, a couple of community activists I know were at a party, working leftists, and one thought to return Victor Davis Hanson’s book about the Hoplites to the other. Never underestimate the interest.
December 27, 2007 at 12:36 pm
rdale
Just found your blog and have gone back and read several pages; this one about the Powder River/Fetterman/Custer was very interesting. I went to the Custer site some years ago after having gone to Western History Assoc. in Billings. I’ve worked in history (as an archivist) my whole career and have written five books–and over 100 articles–on western American history, but am not a member of WHA or AHA or any of the others. I got as far as a Master’s in history and got disgusted with academia, and besides, by that time I had a real job in history, working with the “bare bones of history” as I always say. But I meant to say that another such site is the Bear River Massacre, which you can easily find if you are driving north from Logan, Utah. One of my professors at the University of Utah–and subsequently a real mentor and hero of mine–Dr. Brigham Madsen, was the one who is responsible for changing the popular name of that incident from the Battle of Bear River to the Bear River Massacre, which more accurately describes what occurred.
I’ve bookmarked your site and look forward to reading more,
December 27, 2007 at 2:14 pm
ari
Thanks, rdale. You’re very kind to take the time to comment. I really appreciate it, particularly in the midst of the Ron Paul nonsenselanche — nobody to blame but myself for that, of course. And yes, Bear River is another fascinating spot. Again, thanks.
December 29, 2007 at 8:29 pm
Wounded Knee « The Edge of the American West
[...] he’s currently writing about the Ghost Dance. And given that I’ve blogged a bit about the need for a reinterpretation of the Indian Wars, the following post is particularly welcome. So thanks, Louis, for taking the time to do [...]